• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Hawk ID Central Texas (1 Viewer)

camallard

Well-known member
This photo was taken by a friend at a park NE of San Antonio. We are guessing it's a Harris's Hawk but it would be out of it's range according to what we have researched so far. Please help to confirm. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Hawk_004.jpg
    Hawk_004.jpg
    142.7 KB · Views: 152
This photo was taken by a friend at a park NE of San Antonio. We are guessing it's a Harris's Hawk but it would be out of it's range according to what we have researched so far. Please help to confirm. Thanks.

Harris Hawk and not unusual in the area from my experience.
 
It's not. It's missing the yellow cere of a Harris Hawk and also the white flash at the base of the tail as well as the white tip to the tail. What you have here is a darker Red-tailed Hawk. Not to mention you can just make out the patagial bar of a Red-tailed on the nearest wing.

-Matt.
 
MLoyko-thanks. Now that you point out those things, it does look like a RTH dark morph. The wings also are more RTH than Harris. A very "expert birder" in this area said it was a Harris. Makes me wonder about their bird counting!
 
You're welcome, everybody makes mistakes even the best sometimes. It wouldn't be fun if everyone was perfect. :t: Glad I could help.
 
Exactly, Matt. Also, Harris's Hawks never have red on the chest, nor would their tails look red like this bird's tail.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome, everybody makes mistakes even the best sometimes. It wouldn't be fun if everyone was perfect. :t: Glad I could help.

Wise words. No-one on BF should be afraid of making mistakes. However competent! As a wonderful person once said, "Learn to fail, or fail to learn." A consensus always develops based on available evidence. Please allow no-one here to "have a go", and NOT fear ridicule, because they did a great thing. And did what they could to help someone who needed help. If we fail, at least we tried to help. Everyone who learns to fail here, never fails to learn by their mistakes. A world without imperfections would be boringly perfect. A world without diffuculty, and "left-field strangeness" would be not my world! I celebrate the mistakes of others. Long may I live to be informed of these mistakes. And long may we ALL learn from those of others and, ourselves...
 
Wise words. No-one on BF should be afraid of making mistakes. However competent! As a wonderful person once said, "Learn to fail, or fail to learn." A consensus always develops based on available evidence. Please allow no-one here to "have a go", and NOT fear ridicule, because they did a great thing. And did what they could to help someone who needed help. If we fail, at least we tried to help. Everyone who learns to fail here, never fails to learn by their mistakes. A world without imperfections would be boringly perfect. A world without diffuculty, and "left-field strangeness" would be not my world! I celebrate the mistakes of others. Long may I live to be informed of these mistakes. And long may we ALL learn from those of others and, ourselves...

Right on
 
There is something about this photograph that bothers me. It is the rather delicate Tarsi this bird has. The Tarsi on both the Harris Hawk and Red-tailed Hawk are much more robust. There is also the rather small branch from which it is either taking off from or about to perch on. And there is the length of the feathering on it's Tarsi.

I wonder if it is not a Dark Morph Rough-legged Hawk.

For those who have Wheeler's books I refer you to plate # 420 in the Eastern Edition and plate # 472 in the Western Edition. Quote: "White outer lores and forehead. Brown head. Dark brown iris. * Brown breast often mottled with tawny-rufous; belly and flanks often darker brownish black. May have white or tawney speckling on breast, especially at breast-belly junction. Feathered tarsi. * Wings extend past tail tip."

Notes on page 16 of the Eastern Edition: Adult Male Black Type: HEAD.--Pronounced white mask. Very rarely, the white forehead may be reduced or lacking on the blackest types. ......."

The range map in the Western Edition shows it's winter range extends into south-central Texas below Dallas. To make things more complicated this range overlaps with parts of the "Eastern" RTH, parts of the "Harlans" RTH, all of the "Western" RTH and all of the "Fuertes" RTH and all of these RTH's have Dark Morphs.

Bob
 
The bill looks too large for RLH in my opinion and also ever picture I looked at in wheeler's shows the feathering on the tarsi coming all the way down to the talon as clearly this bird does not. I'm still on Red-tail.
 
Agree with Matt. Think legs look somewhat thin because they are fully extended. RLHawk would also be out of range in San Antonio area (it's a long way from Dallas) AFAIK. EBird has no records of RL Hawk in Bexar Co. (where SA is located).

Best,
Jim
 
So it would be a "Rufous morph" "Western" Red-tailed Hawk? Is that about correct? I don't think I will ever learn all the different morphs and variations of Red-tailed Hawks.........
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top