• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Warbler ID, UK (1 Viewer)

sambushes

sBushes
Hello,

Could anyone help me ID this?
From the Malvern Hills today.
It was in a small tree at edge of playing field next to a wood.

Still learning about warblers....I read the beginners guide post.
Of the common ones, the only ones that seem possible are willow, garden or chiffchaff.

It was making a monotonous short sound, different to the garden warbler sounds I find online, closer to the "call" section of the willow warbler I can hear on www.british-birdsongs.uk. But no strong white supercilium here so does this mean not a chiffchaff or willow warbler?

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2019-04-14 at 23.51.21.jpg
    Screenshot 2019-04-14 at 23.51.21.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 72
  • 1j.jpg
    1j.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 31
  • 2j.jpg
    2j.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 44
  • 3j.jpg
    3j.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
The "song" of the Chiffchaff is more a repetitive series of notes than an actual song, as far as I am aware; which fits in well with your description "monotonous".
 
It definitely didn't vocalise the chiffchaff song... its so distinctive...
This was more monotonous and larger intervals between notes.
But could have been the "call", or "alarm call" listed here...
https://www.british-birdsongs.uk/chiffchaff/?type1572

Though I would still say it was closer to the willow warbler "call" on that website to my memory. But maybe that's my memory playing tricks on me.

Is it normal that the supercilium is not so pronounced?
Is this to do with plumage at this time of year or something?

Thanks!
 
It's a perfectly normal Chiffchaff. Another feature that is diagnostic is the number of emarginations on the primary feathers: CC have emarginations up to P6, whilst on Willow W they reach P5 only. This is well visible on your 1st pic.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top