• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Mr. Wollweber, Mr. Alxandre/Alexander and Mr. Rieffer (1 Viewer)

I think I remember that in one of the Liste des types d'oiseaux des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle de Paris that I read that Rieffer was Dutch. I believe in the one Chlorornis riefferii was mentioned. I am not sure if there is a Volume about Thraupidae.
 
I don't think any Passerine part has been published yet. Rieffer is mentioned in part 14 (Pigeons (Columbidae), deuxième partie) and in part 16 (Perroquets (Psittacidae)). In part 14, Chlorornis riefferi is mentioned as well, but I see nothing about Rieffer's nationality.
Columbi-Gallina linearis Prévost in Knip, Temminck & Prévost, 1843.
Knip & Prévost, Les Pigeons éd. 2, 2 : 104, pl. 55.
Geotrygon linearis (Prévost, 1843).
C.G. 2003-2663. Holotype par monotypie.
Autres numéros de catalogues : A.C. n° 11521, N.C. n° 889.
Inscriptions sous le socle :
Colombie / M. Rieffer / 1843 / 11521 / Geotrygon linearis / Prév. et Knip. Type.
Étiquette du socle :
Geotrygon linearis / (Prév. & Knip.) / Type / M. Riéffer / Colombie.
M. Riéffer séjournait à cette époque à Bogota en Colombie où il voyageait à la recherche de spécimens qu’il envoyait en Europe. Il était alors connu des naturalistes, entre autres de J. C. Temminck qui a suggéré à A. Boissonneau de lui dédier un Tangara : Chlorornis r. riefferii (Boissonneau, 1840).
The relevant bits in part 16 are already quoted by Björn above.
 
Last edited:
A. H. Alexander

… as in the invalid "Aphantochroa alexandri" BOUCARD 1891 (syn. Heliodoxa xanthogonys SALVIN & GODMAN 1882)
= A. H. Alexander, West Hoboken, Palisade Ave., New Jersey (not new York, as I stated in post No. 2), taxidermist and importer of foreign bird-skins, who had a "factory"/depot/ feather foundry in Paterson Avenue, West Hoboken, New Jersey.

See links; here, here and here (the latter by Boucard, in English).

Also see the following link (here) where "A. H. Alexander, in West Hoboken" himself writes:
"It is a trade of many turns and sudden whims; but I find that it runs in a cycle say of seven years. Now it is this bird, now that. Once we had a run on seafowl, and the sea swallow, as they were called, was on every hat. Then we hunted the seashore. Then, perhaps, humming birds were in demand, and down into South America we went. Just now it is whole birds for hat fronts or set pieces for turbans. What it will be next fall the Lord only knows, I don't.. It may take a sudden turn back to ostrich. A feather fancy runs about three years. In the first year the fashion is set by the best people, who pay the best prices. There willowy aigrettes are now the fashion, and so the long, slender egret points sell for $40 per ounce. The man who foresaw the fashion and has a supply makes a fortune; the man who is loaded up with stock which is not the style cannot give it away." — A.H. Alexander
On the same page he is described: " ... Mr. Alexander was an ornithologist, and differed from the ordinary feather dealer in knowing his stock in trade; for with a single feather as a text the genial tradesman could preach of family and genera, of habitat and habits, of past and present trade history, and tell, too, of trips into every nook of the world in feather quests."

If of any help?
---
 
Mark, I´m not all convinced (by that correspondence) that Mr. A. H. Alexander "lived in Port of Spain Trinidad in December 1866", doesn´t it simply tell us that Baird received a letter from him, sent from that location, probably during one of Mr. Alexander's collecting trips (as told by himself in Post #27). Even then I think his true home was in West Hoboken, New Jersey …

However, here´s some additional info (nothing major) on "A.H. Alexander", but from the original source, mentioned in Post #27, from the journal Forest and Streams 1886 (here).

Well, that´s about all I can manage and find on him (and those other men), following the clues we´ve got this far.

I will have to leave them here (with very little added, remaining almost unknown), as, like I mentioned before, they are not on my list (of Swedish Common Bird names) and searching further seem to be far, far too time-consuming. However, it was worth, at least fun, giving it a try!

Mr. Wollweber, Dr. Alexandre, Professor Alexander, Mr. Alexander Smith and Monsieur Rieffer (or Riéffer) … over and out!

Anyone trying harder? Good luck!
-
 
A. H. Alexander = "Alfred Henry Alexander (1834-1916)"

Long, long overdue ...

Regarding A. H. Alexander, earlier dealt with in post #2, 7, 9, and 27-30 ... (back in 2016)

Suddenly new and additional information; here!

Great work, Paul! :t:

Björn
 
Alexander Smith's "Red-headed Flowerpecker Weaverfinch", or simply "his" Antpecker

I might as well deliver/contribute with something myself to this old thread, (even if of less impact on today's nomenclature), regarding ...

alexandri as in:
● the invalid "Lobornis alexandri" SHARPE 1874, OD in post #2, end part [i.e. most likely a juvenile specimen of Woodhouse's Antpecker Parmoptila woodhousei CASSIN 1859, a k a Red-headed Antpecker alt. Flowerpecker Weaver Finch (or the somewhat unwieldy, loooong English name; Red-headed Flowerpecker Weaverfinch!)]

... which ought to be aimed at Dr. Alexander Smith (18181883), whose full name was John Alexander Smith Scottish naturalist, Medical doctor, Presbyterian missionary in Old Calabar [today's Akwa Akpa, in southern Nigeria], Member of several creditable societies, corresponding member of ditto/s ..., etc., etc.

In short; born in Edinburgh, Scotland, in June 1818 (no exact date) .. died in Churchill, Morningside (in the same Town), 17th of August 1883.

All based on what's told here (and the OD, of course) + his Obituary, in the Edinburgh Medical Journal, 29 (3): pp. 286-288, (of Sept. 1883); here alt. here.

Re. the Generic name; "Lobornis alexandri" SHARPE 1874, from (Greek) lobos lobe [like/in line with; the lobe of the ear/ear lobe] + ornis bird; "... distinguishable by the lobes near the gape. When the bird was first taken out of spirit these lobes were very distinct, three in number, and pure white; they have almost disappeared since the bird was skinned" (Sharpe 1874), "... It has recently been proved [*] that these white lobes are a sign of immaturity, and L. alexandri is only the young of a Parmoptila, probably P. woodhousei. (Sharpe 1906).

Enjoy!

Björn

_________________________________________________________________________
*Probably the lobes, or "waxy-glands" (the expansions and warts at the posterior edge of the upper mandible and ...)",
as noted by Butler/St. Quintin/Russ, in 1898, here, alt./a k a "beak-warts", by Butler, in 1899, here (pp.117, 127)
.
--
 
Last edited:
Dr Alexander Smith's (invalid) Antpecker

Additional info (alt. simply a confirmation) on the synonymous "Lobornis alexandri" SHARPE 1874 ...

Martin W. Woodcock. 2003. Systematics and confusion in the genus Parmoptila. BBOC 123 (4): pp.274-277 (here):
[...]
An early contribution to confusion in the nomenclature occurred when Sharpe (1874) erected a new genus to describe what eventually turned out to be a fledgeling of P. woodhousei, naming it Lobornis alexandri on account of the white wattles at the gape. The description was repeated by Sharpe (1885) with a coloured figure. Sharpe (1908) recognised his mistake, and Lobornis was synonomised with Parmoptila. ...
[...]
"Sharpe (1885)", here (my blue):
a. Ad. sk. --- Old Calabar. --- Dr. Alexander Smith [P.]

a. Adult skin --- Old Calabar --- Dr. Alexander Smith [P. = Presented by (see Introduction page)]

[+ Plate II, fig.2, with the (white) "lobes" and all, here]

"Sharpe (1908)", here:
... it will be remembered that I described a bird from Old Calabar as a new genus, Lobornis, on account of the white wattles on the gape. In my ‘Hand-list of Birds’ (vol. iv. p. 233) appears a note from Pastor Kleinschmidt suggesting that Lobornis alexandri would turn out to be a young Parmoptila. I do not know whence Mr. Kleinschmidt drew his inspiration, but it turns out to be a happy one, for I think that there can be no question of the correctness of his suggestion, and Lobornis alexandri must be united to Parmoptila woodkousei. It may be, of course, that L. alexandri is the young of Parmoptila rubrifrons (Sharpe & Ussher), but that we cannot determine until we get adult birds from Old Calabar.
Further details on the Etymology itself (and Dr John Alexander Smith) in post #33.

Enjoy!

"Lobornis alexandri" ... over and out!

Björn
--
 
Last edited:
Mr. Rieffer

PS. I´ve seen no trace (other than the one we know of since last year's thread) of his first name being "Gabriel". Maybe we´re simply looking for: Charles Marie JuIes Louis Riéfer (Charles-Marie-JuIes-Louis Riéfer)!? He apparently collected some Naturalia (at least snakes) together with Hippolyte Joseph Henri Goudot in South America during the early 1800's. Who knows?
--

Sorry I have to come back on this. I think Justin Marie Goudot and not Hippolyte Joseph Henri Goudot was the snake collector. We discussed that brothers already.

And Charles Marie JuIes Louis Riéfer I do not see in Columbia. He seems a military guy here and this in 1917.

The Eponym Dictionary of Birds claims by the way:

Gabriel Rieffer (DNF) was a collector in South America (1830s), but little seems to be known about him. Bourcier (q.v.) and Mulsant (q.v.) described Trochilus riefferi (1843), a junior synonym of Amazilia tzacatl, and said simply that Rieffer was a: 'voyageur dans cette partie de L'Amérique méridional'.

But I agree no further evidence that the name Gabriel is correct. Maybe Paul is able by any yet unknown travel documents to identify him?
 
Regarding Gabriel I feel this might be through a misinterpretation by Google of the character ß and it might be in fact Dr. Gabriel Rießer here. At least it is him I found when I searched for Gabriel Riefer.

I hoped that I get more information here . But we are much further than what's written in Man & Nature o many of them:

who were Rieffer, Alexandre , Heloisa , Wollweber and the Paris brothers? The names of three of these missing persons are to be found in the hummingbird family, the Trochilidae . Rieffer of Rieffer's hummingbird ( Amazilia tzacat / ) is mentioned by Boissonneau , the French naturalist, as the person for whom Temminck would have named the bird had that Dane gotten around to publishing the description. Rieffer is known to have been in Colombia in the 1830s and was described as “zealous" in collecting natural history specimens. Of Alexandre we know only that he practiced medicine in Mexico. Bourcier and Mulsant , French naturalists named the black-chinned hummingbird (Archilochus alexandri) for him. Heloise's hummingbird (Atthis heloisa) is named for whom? We know that it was first described and named by Lesson and Delattre but they did not tell for whom they named the species. We also know that Lesson named the blue - throated hummingbird for his wife, Lampornis clemenciae. Could Heloise be the name of Delattre's wife? If a biography of Delattre could be found , one might be able to answer the question .

No substantial new news.

In Audubon to Xántus: The Lives of Those Commemorated in North American Bird Names as:

RIEFFER . Identity unknown. An obscure collector or dealer of the 1830s and 1840s who worked in or around Bogotá, Colombia, and in other parts of South America; the Paris Museum lists specimens purchased in 1841, 1843 and 1844. Many of his birds were described by the French naturalist Boissonneau. Rufous-tailed Hummingbird Amazilia tzacatl ( De la Llave , 1833 ). A Central and South American species. Accidental Brownsville , southern Texas. Also known as Rieffer's Hummingbird.

I am wondering what's listed in Leiden if Temminck was involved.

Maybe already mentioned here indeed called collector Rieffer, Gabriel. If correct or not I have no clue. Not seen OD of Zentrygon linearis linearis (Prévost, 1843) ( I remember Laurent found Les pigeons in the past) and Pyrrhura calliptera (Massena & Souancé, 1854) (No Rieffer mentioned. I ask myself not another case of Art. 50.1. and only Massena, 1854 would be correct?).
 
Last edited:
Ok regarding Hrr. Wollweber I have a possible lead (or a possible red-herring).

A large Venezuelan family is named Wollweber-Cotton

The founders of this dynasty were

Rudolph Wollweber Pretorius and Josefina Cotton Mesa

Rudolph emigrated to the New World in 1877.

Herr Rudolph Wollweber Pretorius was born Johannes Carl Theodor Rudolph Wollweber (Bap. 9. Apr 1856 Butzbach, Hessen, Deutschland) the son of Wilhelm Wollweber (b. 16 Feb 1818 Hesse ) and Karoline Henriette Bertha Praetorius (b. 1 Jan 1830, Hesse).

I suspect but I can't prove yet that our collector was Wilhelm Wollweber (b. 16 Feb 1818) who between the ages of about 20 and 36 collected throughout middle America before returning to Germany to marry and filled his son with the stories of life in Middle America - leading to his immigration in 1877.

Here it has

"mi tatarabuelo y abuelo alemán, Rodolfo Wollweber Pretorius (eran químicos, botánicos y médicos)."

I know it's weak but Wollweber and Reiffer are really tough and this has been the only glimmer of a lead I have got...

P
 
Last edited:
Maybe already mentioned here indeed called collector Rieffer, Gabriel. If correct or not I have no clue. Not seen OD of Zentrygon linearis linearis (Prévost, 1843) ( I remember Laurent found Les pigeons in the past) and Pyrrhura calliptera (Massena & Souancé, 1854) (No Rieffer mentioned. I ask myself not another case of Art. 50.1. and only Massena, 1854 would be correct?).
This question may went down by the rest.

Pyrrhura calliptera (Massena & Souancé, 1854) or (Massena, 1854). Of cause all descriptions show only Mass. and this may the reason 50.1. is not appropriate for this case.

The Prevost Pigeons seems not any more online?
 
Last edited:
Pyrrhura calliptera (Massena & Souancé, 1854) or (Massena, 1854). Of cause all descriptions show only Mass. and this may the reason 50.1. is not appropriate for this case.
ICZN Art. 50.1. (part):
If a work is by more than one person but it is clear from the contents that only one of these is responsible for the name or act, then that person is the author
The work is by Massena & Souancé but the names are explicitly attributed to Massena alone => Massena alone is the author of the names.

The Prevost Pigeons seems no any more online?
Columbigallina linearis: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/51632565 , but Rieffer is not cited there.
(Note that scans of the OD are also associated to the type specimen on the MNHN website.)
 
Cool. I did not realize that the book is now availble on biodiversitylibrary.org.

I am wondering if the father or a brother of Antoinette Paulette Jacqueline Knip née. Rifer de Courcelles may have collected? There might be a link to Temminck. About her e.g. here, here or here (Justin may remember this one)

If I read here ...

Née à Paris le 26 juillet 1781 , Antoinette-Pauline-Jacqueline Rifer de Courcelles était fille d'un officier de marine, qui perit dans la guerre d'Amérique .

...he might even have been in Colombia.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top