• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Dragonfly ID help. (1 Viewer)

Wayland

Well-known member
Hi,
here are a few more unsure ID Dragonfly pics with regard previous thread.
Same problem, have I got the ID correct being Large Red Damselfly, Migrant Hawker, Red-eyed Damselfly and Ruddy Darter.
Any help, tips etc more than welcome.
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Large Red Damselfly.jpg
    Large Red Damselfly.jpg
    113.6 KB · Views: 90
  • Migrant Hawker.jpg
    Migrant Hawker.jpg
    122 KB · Views: 93
  • Red-eyed Damselfly.jpg
    Red-eyed Damselfly.jpg
    136 KB · Views: 99
  • Ruddy Darter.jpg
    Ruddy Darter.jpg
    120.5 KB · Views: 81
Hi,
here are a few more unsure ID Dragonfly pics with regard previous thread.
Same problem, have I got the ID correct being Large Red Damselfly, Migrant Hawker, Red-eyed Damselfly and Ruddy Darter.
Any help, tips etc more than welcome.
Thank you!

The only one that may be incorrect is the third, which I feel may be a female Small Red-eyed Damselfly. A dorsal view would have been better, but eye colour suggests this species to me.
 
The only one that may be incorrect is the third, which I feel may be a female Small Red-eyed Damselfly. A dorsal view would have been better, but eye colour suggests this species to me.

I suspect that No 3 is a teneral male Red-eyed Damselfly. Teneral because of the green colouration, male because of the red eyes even at this early stage and Red-eyed because of the marking on segment 8.

Regards

Alan
 
Thanks guys, you have introduced me to a new word - Teneral.
I am just about to go and find out what it means.
Thanks for the help.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top