• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Pan-Alcidae (1 Viewer)

Melanie

Well-known member
Germany
Evolution of body mass in the Pan-Alcidae (Aves, Charadriiformes): the effects of combining neontological and paleontological data
N. Adam Smith


Paleobiology
Copyright © 2015 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pab.2015.24 (About DOI), 19 pages. Published online: 22 October 2015

http://journals.cambridge.org/actio...=online&aid=10009825&fileId=S009483731500024X

and

Brian Switek: The Greatest Auk In: National Geographic 6 November 2015

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2015/11/06/paleo-profile-the-greatest-auk/
 
DiGiacomo, Alexandria A., "A Phylogenetic Analysis of Extinct and Extant Pan-Alcidae (Charadriiformes: Aves)" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 128.

[pdf]
 
DiGiacomo, Alexandria A., "A Phylogenetic Analysis of Extinct and Extant Pan-Alcidae (Charadriiformes: Aves)" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 128.

[pdf]

A good find!

I just had a quick glance at it and saw in the Literature Cited on page 36 a mistake:

Hildegarde, H. 1982. Fossil birds from Tertiary marine beds at Oceanside, San Diego County, California, with descriptions of two new species of the genera Uria and Cepphus (Aves: Alcidae). Contributions in Science 341:1-15.

Of course this must the great and famous Hildegarde Howard, the first female paleornithologist, a pupil of Loyd Holmes Miller, who worked in California in the last century. Alexandria should not make this mistake.

But I first have to read this thesis, but at first glance I like it.

Fred
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top