JWN Andrewes
Poor Judge of Pasta.
I think in the law that releasing information is not accepting responsibility for others actions. Yes you might be perceived as tempting them but you are not the one jumping in the car and travelling. I don't think any court would argue that you compelled them...
Who in their right mind would try and use that as a defence? What would you gain by it? My car does 100mph and there is an accelerator under my right foot but that doesn't mean I could claim that the car manufacturer is responsible for my speeding.
I love reading about these 'rare' birds wherever they are, next door next town next country England Finland I could on.
There is something in the civil law, mainly aimed at the protection of children called 'allurements', maybe that needs to apply.
It basically states that where something is deemed as extra enticing, then measures outside the norm are required to prevent harm.
Rather different situation to putting news out of a rare bird you've found, as the objective of such an act during the current lockdown would simply be to notify others of your find; there would be no intent from the finder to allure others to travel to see the bird for themselves.
When talking about where responsibility would lie I was more meaning in a moral sense than a legal one. The problem I would have is not worrying about whether I would be getting myself into trouble with the authorities, rather whether I would be causing harm.