Doesn't look a pipit to me, I'd say this is a Crested Lark.
That was my thought too.
One can almost sense that the tertials are slightly shorter than the primaries, and the wing in particular has the pattern and structure of that robust species.
Peter
Just does not look like a Lark to me, apparently small bill is better for a Pipit despite Peter's 'sense' of the tertials IMHO.....?
A
FWIW, I'm currently residing in Larksville rather than Pipiton, mostly on posture.
Looking at these again I tend to agree it looks more lark than pipit, especially the first photo.
I like your attitude:t:
There's got to be some evidence to ones "feel" or "sense" of the genus.
Here's one more "de-tail" in favour of Crested Lark versus Tawny Pipit: the tail projection is shorter in the former than in the latter.
http://www.netfugl.dk/pictures.php?id=showpicture&picture_id=57516
http://www.netfugl.dk/pictures.php?id=showpicture&picture_id=57887
Peter
The bill structure alone, IMHO defeats you argument, way to small and narrow based than ant Crested I ever saw? I never looked at this and thought Lark?
A