Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
More discoveries. NEW: Zeiss Victory SF 32

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

100-400 mk11

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 12th August 2019, 10:26   #1
Geoff Pain
Rural Member
 
Geoff Pain's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Settle,North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,175
100-400 mk11

I currently have a 300 f2.8 and am starting to find it a bit heavy and cumbersome to carry about so am thinking of getting a 100-400 lens, what are they like and is it any good with a 1.4 tc. Thanks Geoff
Geoff Pain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 12th August 2019, 12:33   #2
stevo
Registered User
 
stevo's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hogwarts.
Posts: 2,940
They take a 1.4tc mkiii very well.
stevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 12th August 2019, 17:01   #3
Dave Williams
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Wales
Posts: 2,620
It's an excellent lens, very sharp and the AF is fast when used on it's own. Still produces a sharp image with the 1.4TC MK3 but AF is a bit slow for BIF. I just wish they had made the lens with an internal zoom as I dislike the fact the barrel pops out and makes it more likely to suck in dust.
You will miss the bokeh of the 300 f2.8 though.
Dave Williams is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 13th August 2019, 21:20   #4
johnf3f
johnf3f

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Wales UK
Posts: 1,155
I have both the 100-400 Mk2 and 300 F2.8 L IS Mk1 and the 300 is the better lens IMO. Having said that the 300 is heavier, fatter and is a fixed 300. The 100-400 Mk2 is lighter, more versatile, closer focusing and a very nice lens. It is very much down to your personal needs.

My 100-400 Mk2 works quite well with my 1.4 Mk3 extender but my 300 F2.8 works just as well with my 2 x Mk3 extender and with the 1.4 Mk3 extender is at the very least equal to my 100-400 Mk2 bare.

Where I forsee a specific need I will take along my 300, when I am not certain (or are just "Wombling" about) then the 100-400 Mk2 is my lens of choice.

It shows how much Zoom lenses have improved when a 4 x zoom can compete with one of the best lenses going!

You would probably be very happy with the 100-400 Mk2 (I am) but check/try one or two out first as your 300 will take a lot to equal it. It is all a compromise, size/weight/versatility/AF etc etc.
johnf3f is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 8th November 2019, 06:26   #5
thanks4thefish42
B-b-b-bird, b-birdd's a word

 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 13
I’ve got both 300 f2.8 and 100-400 v2 and the 400mm 5.6

All excellent lenses

For weight savings the 400mm 5.6 is still after 20 years a fast to focus detail rich lens.
thanks4thefish42 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 7d mk11 foxydave Canon 4 Wednesday 13th July 2016 21:02
70-200 f2.8 is USM mk11 +2xTc Ian Hardy Canon 9 Sunday 6th March 2016 21:50
canon 2x ext.mk1/mk11? spock Canon 4 Saturday 16th January 2010 07:18

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.13724303 seconds with 17 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:04.