I realize there's no correct answer here, but I'd like to hear from those with experience if the extra pound in weight is worth the effort of luggin it around, just in general. Of course the lighter scope is better for long hikes, and the 82mm is great for low light, etc. But just in general what is the opinion of those who have used both. Right now there is only a $50.00 difference in price between the two Nikon scopes, and I'm going to get one or the other. And the 60mm scope is about (1) lb lighter. Is this (1) lb a huge difference when walking around birding for a few hours? Or is the 82mm scope worth the weight because it's just that much better to bird with?? Thanks for your opinions!
Bob
Bob