Panamoz do that lens for 891+shipping, all VAT and duty paid. Avoiding VAT isn't just a good deal, it's illegal and the person buying it is the one responsible.
You won't get UK warranty without a UK invoice. Some importers (eg Panamoz and HDEW) do their own warranties of various types. You also might not be eligible for any UK rebates (even if you get a UK invoice they need to have European serial numbers).
I've just used Panamoz and they were generally ok although they messed me about a bit with split shipments and service is a little difficult with the time zone differences. I've used HK ebay traders for various bits and bobs but I wouldn't be too happy using them for an expensive lens.
Grey imports are ok if you stick to reliable companies, but they are still a bit of gamble.
Nice one Jaff, think I'll steer clear of the HK imports and go for that site
Just had a quick look at the pricing on the 400 f5.6. Panamoz list it at £892 and then you can get 5% off if you pay by BT so it would be down to £848. A quick look at prices in Hong Kong shows that the same lens sells for 11280 HKD (price from a well known HK camera retailer) which using a currency converter works out at ~£915! So Panamoz are selling the lens for less than in HK yet claiming it has VAT and duty paid, for the VAT and duty to have been paid the pre tax price would have to be down at about £665. If they supply their stock with VAT paperwork then they are definitely the cheapest legal option available.
I'll have to check but I'm pretty sure they don't supply a VAT invoice (their website even states they don't). It's a tricky one, they seem to be a reliable company but your calculations do seem to suggest that they're sneaking past VAT/duty when they can.
To echo Jaff's comment, Flash Camera are definitely above board IME (and HDEW from comments on here). If we didn't live in "Rip Off Britain" we wouldn't be so tempted by such deals! Oh well, we live and learn.
I was discussing this with a good friend last night and we both agreed that while we would love to pay less for our lenses we do appreciate things like NHS which are paid for by our taxes. I would hate to live somewhere where the decision about whether to take my child to the doctors was driven by cost rather than concern. I suspect that for many the amount they pay in taxes will work out less than the cost of their medical treatment on an annual basis. Opps not supposed to talk politics on here so I'll slap my own wrist for that, but I do find the whole "rip off Britain" thing a bit annoying.
Public funded healthcare is very nice, but Britain is far from the only country that has it, nor is it the most effective, so I don't really see why that should mean so much of our domestic pricing is so inflated. I certainly don't agree with companies having an unfair advantage by avoiding tax, but even without that we're paying more in a UK shop than we do elsewhere and not just on lenses. That's the rip-off; for a whole variety of reasons we end up paying more money for nothing extra compared to many other countries.
That's the rip-off; for a whole variety of reasons we end up paying more money for nothing extra compared to many other countries.
I do find the whole "rip off Britain" thing a bit annoying.
Well said Adam :clap:, these 'rip off Britain' post are so boring and a sure way to turn folks off a thread IMHO.Ok yes it's rip off Britain blah blah but plz if your going to discuses this kind of thing and has no context for being in the regular forums then do so in ruffled feathers. I'm inclined to say any more posts that stray into that territory on this thread will be deleted.