Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Zeiss - Always on the lookout for something special – Shop now

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Canon Powershot SX70 HS review

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Sunday 9th December 2018, 14:15   #1
ChrisKten
It's true, I quite like Pigeons
 
ChrisKten's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 59,253
Canon Powershot SX70 HS review

Not of interest to me, but I know some here had high hopes for this camera... unless there's other reviews to dispute the image quality and noise, looks like many will be disappointed.

https://www.photographyblog.com/revi...sx70_hs_review
ChrisKten is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 9th December 2018, 15:57   #2
MalR
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sunderland
Posts: 463
Thanks for that, Chris. I for one was hoping this camera was going to be a good upgrade from my old SX50. It has a lot of features that appealed to me, but I can't understand why a company such as Canon would put out a camera which, according to the review, takes a backward step in image quality. Looks like I'll be saving my money.

Malcolm
MalR is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 9th December 2018, 16:13   #3
ChrisKten
It's true, I quite like Pigeons
 
ChrisKten's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 59,253
It's not just, Canon that does it, Malcom - years ago I was looking forward to upgrading from the Panasonic FZ150 to the FZ200, but regardless of the useful technical upgrades, the IQ was no better, and often worse. A few years after that, I had a similar experience with the Sony A58 (DSLT) and the "upgraded" A68.

So they all do it, and it makes no sense to me either.
ChrisKten is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th December 2018, 08:33   #4
Steve McDonald
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
I'm not taking the review that is discussed here very seriously. Most of the photos they included were shot under overcast skies, with very high ISO levels. The motorcycle photos were posted a couple of months ago and none of them are sharply focused. I've seen a few shots posted on discussion forums from the SX70, that look very good. Before a week has passed, I expect there will be many more photos from it on photo-hosting websites, such as Flickr.
Steve McDonald is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th December 2018, 10:52   #5
Neil G.
Registered User
BF Supporter 2018

 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: coombe martin
Posts: 1,581
This sx70 model has to compete with the likes of the nikon p900 which has already proved itself capable in the iq stakes.This canon brings nothing new to the table at all as far as i can see......overcrowding a small sensor with more pixels is the last thing they needed to do.
Maybe canon have surrended to the p900/1000....this camera certainly won't hurt nikon.
Neil G. is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 10th December 2018, 12:53   #6
HermitIbis
Registered User
 
HermitIbis's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
I'm not taking the review that is discussed here very seriously.
Agreed. - Techradar has published a review that seems fair. It includes a nice & sharp telephoto of a starling. The real test, for me, will be opinions from birders comparing the SX50 and SX70 based on personal experience. The Techradar piece is encouraging, however, saying "[the AF] generally brings subjects to focus speedily" and the following remark:
Quote:
Shot-to-shot times are also very good, even when shooting raw files, which is particular useful at the telephoto end when you might want to capture a few frames to compensate for less-than-steady framing.
This reviewer at least knows something about shooting at the long end.
HermitIbis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th December 2018, 14:39   #7
crazyfingers
Registered User
 
crazyfingers's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 1,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by HermitIbis View Post
The real test, for me, will be opinions from birders comparing the SX50 and SX70 based on personal experience.
Agree. Static reviews are a bit worthless to me. It's the side by side next to the SX50 at the long end of the zoom that will make my decision for me.

I'm not ready myself to jump into that effort.
crazyfingers is online now  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2012 2013 2014 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 10th December 2018, 17:15   #8
ClarkWGriswold
Carpe Carpum
BF Supporter 2018
 
ClarkWGriswold's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Caerbannog
Posts: 8,135
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil G. View Post
This sx70 model has to compete with the likes of the nikon p900 which has already proved itself capable in the iq stakes.This canon brings nothing new to the table at all as far as i can see......overcrowding a small sensor with more pixels is the last thing they needed to do.
Maybe canon have surrended to the p900/1000....this camera certainly won't hurt nikon.
Hi Neil. I suspect it won't be long before there's a significant price difference between the P900 and SX70. Early adopters seem to pay a hefty premium. The P1000 is twice the price. On price alone I wouldn't consider the SX70 to be a rival to the P1000.

I know when I (stupidly) left my SX50 at the side of a Scottish Loch, and had to replace it, the competition from Nikon was the P600 (on a pound for pound basis).

Really enjoying your photos on the other thread btw. I know I've said it before, but that Water Rail picture is a belter.

Rich
__________________
"It's a million-to-one-chance, but it might just work" - Fred Colon, Carrot Ironfoundersson, Nobby Nobbs
ClarkWGriswold is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 10th December 2018, 18:26   #9
CalvinFold
Registered User
BF Supporter 2018
 
CalvinFold's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Leandro, CA, USA
Posts: 1,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by HermitIbis View Post
The real test, for me, will be opinions from birders comparing the SX50 and SX70 based on personal experience.
Or for that matter, SX60 vs. SX70.

The Photography Blog link would lead me suspect what I was already worried about...the SX60 already has too much noise above ISO400 and a boost to 20MP without some huge breakthrough in in-camera processing is a bad idea. I still think 16MP sensor in the SX60 was already a small step backwards from the SX50's 12MP sensor.

Anyone have any other SX70 review links yet? I mean real reviews, not preview reviews or reviews barfing-up Canon's marketing materials?
__________________
Kevin (aka CalvinFold)
My Gallery Equipment used: 2013 | 2014 | 20152018
CalvinFold is online now  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2015 2016 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 10th December 2018, 20:41   #10
Neil G.
Registered User
BF Supporter 2018

 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: coombe martin
Posts: 1,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkWGriswold View Post
Hi Neil. I suspect it won't be long before there's a significant price difference between the P900 and SX70. Early adopters seem to pay a hefty premium. The P1000 is twice the price. On price alone I wouldn't consider the SX70 to be a rival to the P1000.

I know when I (stupidly) left my SX50 at the side of a Scottish Loch, and had to replace it, the competition from Nikon was the P600 (on a pound for pound basis).

Really enjoying your photos on the other thread btw. I know I've said it before, but that Water Rail picture is a belter.

Rich
Thanks for that bud,it's much appreciated.
Neil G. is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Yesterday, 01:26   #11
HermitIbis
Registered User
 
HermitIbis's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalvinFold View Post
Anyone have any other SX70 review links yet? I mean real reviews, not preview reviews or reviews barfing-up Canon's marketing materials?
A short review was published on the Dutch EOSzine site. The Google-translated version in English is here. I found it interesting to click on the JPEG / RAW comparison.

Last edited by HermitIbis : Yesterday at 11:59.
HermitIbis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:59   #12
crazyfingers
Registered User
 
crazyfingers's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 1,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by HermitIbis View Post
A short review was published on the Dutch EOSzine site. The Google-translated version in English is here. I found it interesting to click on the JPEG / RAW comparison.
Hi Hermitbis,

The English translation link doesn't seem to work. I'm afraid I don't know how to make the Link. Do you mind checking it?
crazyfingers is online now  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2012 2013 2014 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Yesterday, 12:00   #13
HermitIbis
Registered User
 
HermitIbis's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Black Forest
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyfingers View Post
Hi Hermitbis,

The English translation link doesn't seem to work. I'm afraid I don't know how to make the Link. Do you mind checking it?
Sorry - I've now changed the link in my post. English version.
HermitIbis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 13:28   #14
MalR
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sunderland
Posts: 463
That review seems rather more positive than the one by Photography Blog, although it doesn't go into nearly as much depth. I'm beginning to wonder if, for my limited purposes, this camera might be a contender after all.

It would be especially interesting to see reviews from birders who have decided to give the SX70 a try.

Malcolm
MalR is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 20:17   #15
crazyfingers
Registered User
 
crazyfingers's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 1,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by HermitIbis View Post
Sorry - I've now changed the link in my post. English version.
Thanks. Not a bad review but still it's the side by side against the SX50 that I need.

The photo of the ship was impressive but again, could the SX50 have done just as well?

I don't know anything about optics and the physics of it all. That ship was likely several kilometers away. Birds are usually 10 - 20 meters or so. I don't know if at maximum zoom if they distance would change things.

That ship though was certainly photographed on a good air day. Ripply air often seems the biggest variable at very long distances.
crazyfingers is online now  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2012 2013 2014 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Today, 12:16   #16
Hamhed
Registered User
 
Hamhed's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Asheville, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,189
at this date, I feel like those of us interested but not quite ready to take the plunge are waiting to see who goes first and tests the SX70. I'm currently trying to find a local source.
After a delay in receiving the camera, the local Best Buy sold out immediately, the day they came out, at least according to the website. I am going to stop today and see if that report matches reality. I went to the nearby Walmart website who lists them as coming from a third party, Pixibytes. Reviews for the camera date back to May of this year! They also show an external battery charger, which I understand is not the case. Priced at $544 for the camera plus a card and "charger". Doesn't seem possible. I may go there today and confront the sales people at the electronics section.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Canon-Pow...-Kit/376678244

I'm leaving for 12 days of birding and camping in Georgia and Florida on Friday so time has just about run out to find a replacement for my elderly SX50 before then.

Steve
Hamhed is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon SX70 .... September John Cantelo Canon 53 Friday 30th November 2018 13:58
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS Review ChrisKten Canon 15 Wednesday 11th March 2015 18:12
Canon powershot A1100 IS and Canon 590 Is any good for digiscoping kevin crisp Digiscoping cameras 1 Wednesday 20th January 2010 23:47
Anyone using a Canon Powershot G2? rafiki Digiscoping cameras 0 Friday 1st October 2004 12:02

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.17363310 seconds with 28 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:30.