chris6
Well-known member
Discovery WP PC 10x50 ........................... Adventurer II WP 10x50
field (m) ............... 115 ............................. 96
eye relief (mm) ...... 22 .............................. 17
H/W (mm) ............ 145x133 ...................... 162x133
weight (g) ............. 813 ............................. 760
£ official/FLO ......... 209/179 ...................... 109/109
I am ready to try yet another 10x50 so would appreciate views on these two Opticrons, especially with respect to their optical qualities such as definition, colour, and size of the sweet spot.
On the whole, but only if the quality of view is very similar, I might prefer to try the slightly lighter Adventurer, mainly to save the need to wind up the eyepieces at all when wearing eye glasses due (officially) to having less eye relief than the Discovery.
On the other hand I do see that the Discovery is more compact with a height of 145mm vs. Adventurer's 162mm, and that Discovery also has a wider FOV of 115m, vs. the Adventurer's 96m.
Have you compared them directly or what do you think of either model please?
field (m) ............... 115 ............................. 96
eye relief (mm) ...... 22 .............................. 17
H/W (mm) ............ 145x133 ...................... 162x133
weight (g) ............. 813 ............................. 760
£ official/FLO ......... 209/179 ...................... 109/109
I am ready to try yet another 10x50 so would appreciate views on these two Opticrons, especially with respect to their optical qualities such as definition, colour, and size of the sweet spot.
On the whole, but only if the quality of view is very similar, I might prefer to try the slightly lighter Adventurer, mainly to save the need to wind up the eyepieces at all when wearing eye glasses due (officially) to having less eye relief than the Discovery.
On the other hand I do see that the Discovery is more compact with a height of 145mm vs. Adventurer's 162mm, and that Discovery also has a wider FOV of 115m, vs. the Adventurer's 96m.
Have you compared them directly or what do you think of either model please?
Last edited: