• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New product at Swarovski European Launch Tour (1 Viewer)

Sadly its not a Zoom bino guys..

I actually think a zoom binocular isn't such a good idea. Too heavy. Binoculars need to have a reasonable weight, as far as I'm concerned, and I must admit, I'm not particularly happy with binoculars getting bigger and heavier at the moment.

Hermann
 
I think that a Alpha with guaranteed reliable operating true zoom mechanism, rather than a Switch-Power mechanism, would cost so much to build and be so heavy that they wouldn't sell very well at all. The low priced zoom binoculars on the market are notoriously unreliable.

Bob
 
Last edited:
I think that a Alpha with guaranteed reliable operating true zoom mechanism, rather than a Switch-Power mechanism, would cost so much to build and be so heavy that they wouldn't sell very well at all. The low priced zoom binoculars on the market are notoriously unreliable.

Bob

Couldn't agree more.
 
I think that a Alpha with guaranteed reliable operating true zoom mechanism, rather than a Switch-Power mechanism, would cost so much to build and be so heavy that they wouldn't sell very well at all. The low priced zoom binoculars on the market are notoriously unreliable.

Bob

Brunton made their Epoch Zoom about ten years ago, an 8-15x35 binoculars that employed a true zoom between 8x and 15x. It was heavy at 35 oz., bulky, and cost a ton ($2600 retail). It had a very narrow FOV of 273' at 8x and narrowed even more as you went to 15x. I have one that I picked up drastically marked down after it was discontinued, and the zoom works well to 12x--after that the FOV is too narrow and darkens considerably in low light. The zoom does work well, and the view is quite good, except for the typical excessive CA found in Brunton binos. I can't see Swarovski doing a true zoom (probably $3500+), but Swarovski has the marketing genius to pull it off!
 
For anyone who hasn't looked in the scope forum we now know what is coming, namely a binoviewer and 1.7x extender for the TX scopes.
 
Strange why Swarovski have launched a Bino unit for the TX range of objectives...

It comes in over 2 grand to buy without an objective unit ...It weighs in at about 1.4kg...And you stuck to a fixed magnification when you use it ...About 30x....Plus you can't really use it for digiscoping. ...

However you do get access to less eye fatigue and a more natural and comfortable binocular view ....

However you can save yourself a small fortune and digiscope with the ATX and STX modules and watch the screen with both eyes..

But perhaps I'm just being picky
 
Last edited:
Strange why Swarovski have launched a Bino unit for the TX range of objectives...

It comes in over 2 grand to buy without an objective unit ...It weighs in at about 1.4kg...And you stuck to a fixed magnification when you use it ...About 30x....Plus you can't really use it for digiscoping. ...

However you do get access to less eye fatigue and a more natural and comfortable binocular view ....

However you can view images with both eyes a lot easier whist digiscoping plus you can take pictures of what you see....

But perhaps I'm just being picky

No offense, but you are being picky. A good binoviewer is a bear to make.

If it had been easy, binoculars would use one big objective lens with a binoviewer at the eyepiece end.
 
Strange why Swarovski have launched a Bino unit for the TX range of objectives...

It comes in over 2 grand to buy without an objective unit ...It weighs in at about 1.4kg...And you stuck to a fixed magnification when you use it ...About 30x....Plus you can't really use it for digiscoping. ...

However you do get access to less eye fatigue and a more natural and comfortable binocular view ....

However you can view images with both eyes a lot easier whist digiscoping plus you can take pictures of what you see....

But perhaps I'm just being picky

I don't think you are being picky at all. I can imagine this being brilliant for long term monitoring of nest sites by RSPB and other organisations, and for those who just can't get used to one ocular.

But on dull days its nice to back off the mag to 20x and on crisp clear bright days and something tasty in the distance, rack up the mag to take a peak. And all the time its nice to carry less weight rather than more.

The cost / weight / benefit balance doesn't appeal to me at all.

Lee
 
Strange why Swarovski have launched a Bino unit for the TX range of objectives...

It comes in over 2 grand to buy without an objective unit ...It weighs in at about 1.4kg...And you stuck to a fixed magnification when you use it ...About 30x....Plus you can't really use it for digiscoping. ...

However you do get access to less eye fatigue and a more natural and comfortable binocular view ....

However you can view images with both eyes a lot easier whist digiscoping plus you can take pictures of what you see....

But perhaps I'm just being picky

I agree with your analysis, but I suspect that Swaro see this as an complement to the ATX eye piece, and they want us to buy both.

But who knows, the BTX might be so nice to use that some will actually ditch the ATX and start using the BTX instead. With the extender you might get by pretty well. But it's hard to tell so far, the "Swaro fan boys" invited to those events sometimes seem to be a bit overly enthustiastic.
 
Yeh Lee...
I won't go upgrading .....Happy with my ATS HD 65.....Lighter than the ATX 65 plus a wider field of view with 25-50x zoom. ..Plus a hell of a lot cheaper ..
 
I agree with your analysis, but ...who knows, the BTX might be so nice to use that some will actually ditch the ATX and start using the BTX instead.

Swaro has apparently created a superior binoviewer. I really hope they get the market success that work deserves.
Scopes are nowhere near fun to use because of the monocular view.
Swaro may have the marketing clout to bring about a change for the better with this innovation.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top