Observations on Notebooks.
Hello everyone and a happy new year to you all.
Just a few observations of my own, about what to do with notebooks.
The way that we record our observations has changed over the last few years. Originally the personal notebook was the way for most people. In our notebooks we often recorded personal lists and national lists of what birds we observed. There was not a recognised standard formula for recording our observations. Most people would just record the date, time, place and species. There were a few who would also record temperature, cloud cover, wind direction and maybe rain fall. The lack of a “recording standard” has made many of our observations somewhat fragmented. Add to this the varying level of expertise used to identify species and what can be seen is that the “Hard Data” is unreliable.
There was also in the past an ad-hoc way that people would share information and observations. Some kept records for personal pleasure only. Other might share with individuals within a birding group. Others might share with county recorders. Publication of the information was only within the domain of the rich, larger groups or academic researchers. Whilst the country recorder at a bare minimum should be the repository of the information on a year by year basis. Often this work is done by a relatively few but dedicated individual people, in their own free but limited time.
So what has changed?
The advent of the personal computer, compact disk technology, digital photography, the Internet and the World Wide Web has now brought about a significant change in what we can now achieve. There are many Computer programs available usually on compact disk to aid identification of species, containing both pictures and sound. There are specialist programs to create databases where we can record our personal observations. The internet has given us the unique opportunity to contact a very significant percentage of the world population. The WWW has allowed people to publish their information in the form of personal birding based web pages.
So where do we go next?
What is obviously needed now is a number of on line electronic repositories for all our national information. The repositories will need to have a method of data sharing. The data will need to be stored in such a way that aids dynamic publication and aids searching. In other words we need a formula or definition for a “recording standard” that described the actual data format. The generic data representation definition will be used to specify the structure of the information.
Key fields in the “data format” need to be specified. There are the obvious ones. However, the data format should describe each field in detail. Let’s look by way of an example at recording the date. This could be recorded in a number of ways MM/DD/YYYY including “01:Jan:2003” or “01:01:2003” or even “1st:01:2003” Then there is the American convention of MM/DD/YY Jan:1st:03 or even 03:01:03 to be considered. The information needs to be saved out of your recording program into the “recording standard” prior to being uploaded to your national repository.
(Anyone who is familiar with Family History will have used a “GEDCOM” file at some time. GEDCOM allows the exchange of data from many genealogical programs structured in such a way that the data can be imported into or exported from many different family history programs. See
http://www.gendex.com/gedcom55/55gcch1.htm for more information.)
I have written a program that uses an MS Access database for recording daily observational information collated by our local group members (Barnsley Birding Society in South Yorkshire) The output is then imported into MS Word and used to produce a yearly birding report for the area centred around the RSPB’s Old Moor wetlands centre in the Dearne Valley. Prior to using the program, the report would take almost a year to produce. Now the local area report can be produced and on sale within a few weeks.
Caveat: Back in the early days of computing in the 70’s & 80’s the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) had a doomsday project. The problem now is that the technology used to store the information is so old that the media cannot be read. Let this be a warning. See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2534391.stm
Well that’s it from me.