• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Identification Question about Paradise-flycatcher in Guangxi (1 Viewer)

Barbets48

Well-known member
Yesterday I was birding in a local park in Baise, Guangxi and for the first time came upon a Paradise-flycatcher which was feeding in a small patch of dense trees. The bird was a female, stayed high up just under the canopy, and did not give me excellent views.

My observations were that the bird showed bright rufous coloration on the tail and wings, a fairly thick bill, and a grayish breast and belly.

Knowing this park well and never having seen it here before, the bird is almost certainly a migrant that was passing through.

I'm curious if anyone could provide any insight into whether the bird would most likely be a Blyth's or Amur Paradise-flycatcher. I've mostly ruled out Japanese on the basis of the breast and belly being a pretty uniform color, without any clearly demarcated line/change of color. But I'm unsure whether the range of Blyth's reaches as far East as Baise.

I attached a couple terrible photos that may not be much help (need to buy one of the ultra-zoom cameras some of you were recommending!).

Mike W.
 

Attachments

  • P1120853 (2).jpg
    P1120853 (2).jpg
    251.2 KB · Views: 34
  • P1120852 (2).jpg
    P1120852 (2).jpg
    238.7 KB · Views: 30
Mike,

I would advise trying posting this on the Bird ID thread. I'd like to help, but I'm not familiar with either one and all my China field guides are in China right now and I am not.
 
This is "Amur Paradise Flycatcher" - Japanese would be darker. Amur PF winters in SE Asia, so why not a passage migrant in Guangxi ?
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top