• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Rodents and Hazel Nuts (1 Viewer)

James Thomas

Well-known member
Is it possible to tell which rodents are eating the hazel nuts on my patch by the way they get into the shell? Most of the empty shells are pretty much destroyed and appear broken open, squirrels? Occasionally I find some that have been opened beautifully and have a neat hole with a smooth rim.

Cheers.
 
Thanks for the replies, Dormouse would be good, they were reintroduced to the Yorkshire Dales a couple of years back so would they would be at the edge of their range a few miles south of Leeds?

Below is a shell I picked up the other day, very smooth edge to the cut. I'll have a look for some better (more typical) examples.
 

Attachments

  • Nuts0001.JPG
    Nuts0001.JPG
    47 KB · Views: 55
  • Nuts0002.JPG
    Nuts0002.JPG
    57.3 KB · Views: 51
  • Nuts0003.JPG
    Nuts0003.JPG
    42.6 KB · Views: 53
  • Nuts0004.JPG
    Nuts0004.JPG
    45 KB · Views: 55
Had a root round the internet, it seems that dormice go in through the side and leave toothmarks, this appears to be the work of a vole, top and no toothmarks.
 
Looks like Bank Vole to me too. When you find shells don't forget Wood Mouse, but they leave toothmarks on the outside shell, rim doesn't look as neat as in the photos.

John
 
Think I may have hit the jackpot today, empty shells, toothmarks and opened on the side.
 

Attachments

  • hazelnuts0001.JPG
    hazelnuts0001.JPG
    67.5 KB · Views: 67
It's hard to tell from the photo but I'd say Wood Mouse. The best thing is probably to contact your county mammal group and get it correctly identified.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top