• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Translating old moth names - help needed! (1 Viewer)

MSA

I may be relaxed but I'm not drunk....
I'm updating a species list for Christchurch Harbour, and have three names on the original list from ca 25 years ago that I can't find a match for in my GB field guide -

White-letter Wainscot (Noctuidae)
Blackneck (Noctuidae)
Lesser Satin (Thyatiridae)

I have also assumed that Smooth Rustic is now just Rustic (Common Rustic is also listed separately).

Any help/confirmation gratefully received!
 
Mark

L-album Wainscot used to be called White L Wainscot, which isn't a far cry from White-letter Wainscot.

Blackneck presumably did refer to Blackneck (rather than Scarce or Levant Blackneck)

What about Satin Lutestring for Lesser Satin? At least it's the same family (Thyatiridae)
Perhaps there was a "(Greater) Satin" which may have been in a completely different family?

If you don't get more helpful suggestions on this forum it might be worth trying
UKLeps or UKMoths

http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/uk-leps/

http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/ukmoths/

Peter
 
Hi Mark

White Letter Wainscot is certainly the L-album Wainscot Mythimna l-album
Lesser Satin is now the Common Lutestring Ochropacha duplaris
Smooth Rustic is The Rustic Hoplodrina blanda

Best wishes

Martin
 
Splendid - many thanks Martin! By my reckoning, the updated Harbour list now stands at 686 species including micros, although this only goes to 2009 (macros) and 2010 (micros) so far, so may be a few more. Aiming to publish in 2013 Report, out about May/Jun 2014, if anyone's interested.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top