• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Another wader ID, please (1 Viewer)

missed that - running out of options now - whats left - OK agree with the others but a bit long in the bill though
 
Last edited:
Despite the unlikely location I still see this as a juvenile White-rumped Sandpiper and not a juvenile Little Stint.

In addition to the attenuated rear end with 4 primary tips visible, the lower scapulars and coverts are at odds with Little Stint as is the amount of grey feathering around the eye.

White-rumped Sandpipers:
http://www.birdingworld.co.uk/images/White-rumpedSandpSalthouseOctoberadjcrop.jpg

http://www.jeaniron.ca/Shorebirds/2006/whiterumped0836.jpg


Little Stint:

http://www.digiscoped.com/DSLR/littlestint1web.jpg


Brian

___________________________
www.birdingtoday.co.uk
www.worcesterbirding.co.uk
www.westmidlandsbirding.co.uk
 
Little Stint

Little Stint.

The bright white flanks are a good feature, juvenile White-rumped Sandpiper has at least some streaking at all ages. Also the primary projection looks OK for Little Stint (maybe exagerrated by the angle of the photo a little?). White-rumped's wing tips should look even longer.

BR, Mike
 
Also note the long legs, which helps give the bird a completely different jizz to WRS. I think the long-winged appearance is a photographic illusion (note that the bill looks long too). Juv little stints are very variable. And remember it's in Egypt....
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top