• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Guianan Gnatcatcher (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------
Whittaker, Aleixo, Whitney, Smith & Klicka 2013. A distinctive new species of gnatcatcher in the Polioptila guianensis complex (Aves: Polioptilidae) from western Amazonian Brazil. HBW SV: 301–305. [supp info]

Whitney & Alvarez Alonso 2005. A new species of gnatcatcher from white-sand forests of northern Amazonian Peru with revision of the Polioptila guianensis complex. Wilson Bull 117(2): 113–210. [abstract]
  • Polioptila (guianensis) guianensis - Guianan Gnatcatcher
  • Polioptila (guianensis) facilis - Rio Negro Gnatcatcher [IOC]
  • Polioptila (guianensis) attenboroughi sp nov - Inambari Gnatcatcher
  • Polioptila (guianensis) paraensis - Para Gnatcatcher [IOC]
AOU-SACC Proposal #619 (Carneiro & Aleixo, Dec 2013): Recognize newly described Polioptila attenboroughi and split Polioptila guianensis into three species.

[See also failed AOU-SACC Proposal #204 (Zimberlin, Feb 2006): Treat Polioptila facilis and Polioptila paraensis as a separate species from P. guianensis.]

Atwood & Lerman 2006 (HBW 11):
 
Last edited:
Whittaker, Aleixo, Whitney, Smith & Klicka 2013. A distinctive new species of gnatcatcher in the Polioptila guianensis complex (Aves: Polioptilidae) from western Amazonian Brazil. HBW SV: 301–305. [supp info]

Whitney & Alvarez Alonso 2005. A new species of gnatcatcher from white-sand forests of northern Amazonian Peru with revision of the Polioptila guianensis complex. Wilson Bull 117(2): 113–210. [abstract]
  • Polioptila (guianensis) guianensis - Guianan Gnatcatcher
  • Polioptila (guianensis) facilis - Rio Negro Gnatcatcher [IOC]
  • Polioptila (guianensis) attenboroughi sp nov - Inambari Gnatcatcher
  • Polioptila (guianensis) paraensis - Para Gnatcatcher [IOC]
AOU-SACC Proposal #619 (Carneiro & Aleixo, Dec 2013): Recognize newly described Polioptila attenboroughi and split Polioptila guianensis into three species.

[See also failed AOU-SACC Proposal #204 (Zimberlin, Feb 2006): Treat Polioptila facilis and Polioptila paraensis as a separate species from P. guianensis.]

Atwood & Lerman 2006 (HBW 11):

TiF Update July 30:
The Rio Negro Gnatcatcher, Polioptila facilis, and Para Gnatcatcher, Polioptila paraensis, are split from the Guianan Gnatcatcher, Polioptila guianensis. Also, the newly described Inambari Gantcatcher, Polioptila attenboroughi, is added to the list. See Whitney and Alonso (2005) and Whittaker et al. (2013). I also took the opportunity to rearrange the gnatcatchers a bit.
 
I wonder if Zimmer's confusion over variation in schistaceigula (Slate-throated Gnatcatcher) in his comment to the SACC proposal stems from not knowing the distinct differences between the sexes. They are claimed to be alike in most literature, but are now known to be different. I guess the very small number of museum specimens was the basis for this confusion.

The dark male with eyering http://www.pbase.com/ahlman/image/151251565 (Ecuador)
http://www.pbase.com/ahlman/image/151251567 (Ecuador)
The paler female with eyebrow http://www.pbase.com/ahlman/image/140351546 (Ecuador)
http://www.pbase.com/ahlman/image/151251572 (Ecuador, partner of male in earlier photos)
Pair http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_i61d7tclu...Lh9_pwTd4/s1600/SlatethroatedGnatcatcher1.jpg (Panama)

The differences in darkness between the Ecuador and Panama birds is purely due to light and photo processing. The males and female don't vary much over their range.

The illustration in most field guides is the male, but Handbook of the Birds of the World has a female.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top