Jyothi Ray said:Will something like this happen again??
scampo said:Missed this thread, Pete, but Sancho has said all that's needed! For £500-00, the ED50 + zoom would be unbeatable in many ways.
Is that currently available form anywhere?Penny Clarke said:DITTO - would not swop my Nikon ED50 (with 13-40 Zoom) for anything, both for performance and weight!!!!!!!!! I have a manfrotto travel tripod, incredibly light, but not brilliant for seawatching on a windy Norfolk Day!!!! But I am more than happy with this tripod, can't be doing with carrying heavy stuff around, there's enough to carry as it is with camera/lenses, sandwiches, flask etc etc!!!!! Got a very good deal from Cley Spy.
Best Wishes Penny :girl:
Jyothi Ray said:Is that currently available form anywhere?
Hi JyothiJyothi Ray said:Thanks.
Is it possible to get them second hand from In Focus/Warehouse Express?
Jyothi Ray said:All this feedback and info is great, thanks again.
One more link, is this worth keeping an eye on?
Interesting you say that - and I would have agreed. I was seawatching recently at Titchwell with a friend. Because I thought, as you did, that the ED50 wouldn't be up to it, I took along my Zeiss 85 (my friend, a top local birder, used his Nikon EDII. He didn't miss a thing with his 60mm scope and the views he had were uniformly good). But back to the story...postcardcv said:indeed it's not an ED scope so I'm sure an ED50 would out perform it in many ways. Personally I cannot imagine having an ED50 as my only scope (though I'd love it as a travel scope) - yes it's a great bit of gear, but the 50mm OG is limiting, I'd hate to seawatch with one. Unless weight is a big issue for you then go for a larger OG scope.
scampo said:Interesting you say that - and I would have agreed. I was seawatching recently at Titchwell with a friend. Because I thought, as you did, that the ED50 wouldn't be up to it, I took along my Zeiss 85 (my friend, a top local birder, used his Nikon EDII. He didn't miss a thing with his 60mm scope and the views he had were uniformly good). But back to the story...
Near to us, another birder was using her Nikon ED50 (with zoom). She was keen to look through my scope, feeling her own was maybe lacking in comparison with a full-sized scope. So I looked through hers. Do you think the ED50 performed badly or let itself down in any way? Absolutely not. I was more than surprised by the brightness and overall quality of the view.
I can imagine as the light faded there would surely come a point where the diminutive Nikon would lose its brightness. But I rather suspect that the little ED50 would be a very useful scope for far more occasions than we think.
Well she was - or seemed - new to the hobby and keen to learn (obviously I fooled her I knew something about bird watching. I seem to look brighter than I really am).pduxon said:female birder? titchwell? ED50? did she have blonde hair? could have been BF's Penny Clarke.
scampo said:Do you think the ED50 performed badly or let itself down in any way? Absolutely not. I was more than surprised by the brightness and overall quality of the view.
I can imagine as the light faded there would surely come a point where the diminutive Nikon would lose its brightness. But I rather suspect that the little ED50 would be a very useful scope for far more occasions than we think.