• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Anatidae (1 Viewer)

IOC Update Diary July 9

Transfer 5 species of ‘wigeons’ from Anas to Mareca

(falcata, strepera, penelope, americana, sibilatrix)
(Falcated Duck; Gadwall & Eurasian, American and Chiloe Wigeon)

No mention of the extinct Amsterdam Wigeon (A. marecula)

Transfer 10 species of shovelers and teal from Anas to Spatula

querquedula, hottentota, puna, versicolor, platalea, smithii, rhynchotis, clypeata, cyanoptera, discors

(Gadwall; Hottentot, Puna & Silver Teal; Red, Cape, Australasian, Northern Shoveler; Blue-winged & Cinnamon Teal)

There's a typo on the Taxonomic Updates page which calls these species "Mareca" also
 
Transfer 10 species of shovelers and teal from Anas to Spatula

querquedula, hottentota, puna, versicolor, platalea, smithii, rhynchotis, clypeata, cyanoptera, discors

Querquedula Oken, 1817, type species : Anas circia Linnaeus = Anas querquedula Linnaeus, is not a valid genus ?
 
IOC Update Diary July 9

Transfer 5 species of ‘wigeons’ from Anas to Mareca

Transfer 10 species of shovelers and teal from Anas to Spatula

Querquedula Oken, 1817, type species : Anas circia Linnaeus = Anas querquedula Linnaeus, is not a valid genus ?

Also Baikal Teal from Anas to Sibirionetta.

What are the authors & publication dates / locations for Mareca, Sibirionetta, and Spatula, please?
 
What are the authors & publication dates / locations for Mareca, Sibirionetta, and Spatula, please?
You would probably find authors and dates very easily, e.g., in the last AOU supplement; and part of them in Mark's posts in the supplement thread. Anyway:

Spatula Boie 1822
Boie F. 1822. Ueber Classification, insonderheit der europäischen Vögel. Isis (Oken), Jahrgang 1822:545-571.; p. 564; [OD]
Originally included nominal species: Anas clypeata Linn. 1758
Type fixation: original monotypy
Type species: Anas clypeata Linn. 1758 (Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.; p. 124; [OD])

Mareca Stephens 1824
Stephens JF. 1824. Birds. in: Shaw G. General zoology or systematic natural history. Vol. XII. Part II. J and A Arch, et al., London.; p. 130; [OD]
Originally included nominal species: Mareca fistularis "Brisson" = Stephens 1824 (nec Georgi 1786 quae Anas rufina Pallas 1773!) (with Anas penelope Linn. 1758 as a syn.), Anas melanura Gmelin 1789, Anas "paecilorhyncha Gmelin" = poecilorhyncha Forster 1782, Anas americana Gmelin 1789, Anas bahamensis Linn. 1758, Anas brasiliensis Gmelin 1789, Anas capensis Gmelin 1789 (and Anas glocitans "Gmelin" = Pallas 1779, with a question mark, not eligible as type)
Type fixation: subsequent designation (Eyton TC. 1838. A monograph of the Anatidae or duck tribe. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman, London.; p. 33 [here])
type species: Mareca fistularis Stephens 1824 (Stephens JF. 1824. Birds. in Shaw G. General zoology or systematic natural history. Vol. XII. Part II. J and A Arch, et al., London.; p. 131; [OD])

Sibirionetta Boetticher 1929
Boetticher H von. 1829. Kritische Betrachtungen über Anatiden. Anz. Orn. Ges. Bay. 2:10-15.; p. 11; [OD]
Originally included nominal species: Anas formosa Georgi 1775
Type fixation: original designation (p. 15 of OD)
Type species: Anas formosa Georgi 1775 (Georgi JG. 1775. Bemerkungen einer Reise im Rußischen Reich im Jahre 1772. Kayserl. Akad. Wiss., St Petersburg.; p. 168; [OD])
 
Last edited:
Querquedula Oken, 1817, type species : Anas circia Linnaeus = Anas querquedula Linnaeus, is not a valid genus ?
The name is not available from there.

Oken 1817 [here] compared his own system (left sub-columns, with headers "Okens System") to that of Cuvier 1817 (Règne animal; right sub-column, headers "Cuviers System"); for which he latinised the name of many divisions that were given in French only in the original. 'Querquedula' in Oken 1817 is one such name; it has been interpreted as a Latin name for "les Sarcelles" in Cuvier's work [here].
Under the current rules, no name appearing in the "Cuviers System" sub-columns of Oken's work can be deemed available, because these are part of a classificatory system that is not adopted by the author. Additionally, even if this was not the case, Querquedula would be nude here, as there is no description, no species-group names are associated to the 'generic' name and, the word 'Sarcelles' was not cited by Oken, making it impossible to establish an objective equivalence between it and Querquedula.

Querquedula Stephens 1824
Stephens JF. 1824. Birds. in Shaw G. General zoology or systematic natural history. Vol. XII. Part II. J and A Arch, et al., London.; p. 142; [OD]
Originally included nominal species: Anas circia Linn. 1758 (with A. querquedula Linn. 1758 as a syn.), Anas crecca Linn. 1758, Anas carolinensis Gmelin 1789, Anas formosa "Gmelin" = Georgi 1775, Anas hina Gmelin 1789, Anas manillensis Gmelin 1789, Anas novaehispaniae Gmelin 1789
Type fixation: tautonymy (p. 143 of OD)
Type species: Anas querquedula Linn. 1758 (Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.; p. 126; [OD])

(And Spatula Boie 1822 has priority for the group, indeed.)
 
Last edited:
The name is not available from there.

Oken 1817 [here] compared his own system (left sub-columns, with headers "Okens System") to that of Cuvier 1817 (Règne animal; right sub-column, headers "Cuviers System"); for which he latinised the name of many divisions that were given in French only in the original. 'Querquedula' in Oken 1817 is one such name; it has been interpreted as a Latin name for "les Sarcelles" in Cuvier's work [here].
Under the current rules, no name appearing in the "Cuviers System" sub-columns of Oken's work can be deemed available, because these are part of a classificatory system that is not adopted by the author. Additionally, even if this was not the case, Querquedula would be nude here, as there is no description, no species-group names are associated to the 'generic' name and, the word 'Sarcelles' was not cited by Oken, making it impossible to establish an objective equivalence between it and Querquedula.

Querquedula Stephen 1824
Stephen JF. 1824. Birds. in Shaw G. General zoology or systematic natural history. Vol. XII. Part II. J and A Arch, et al., London.; p. 142; [OD]
Originally included nominal species Anas circia Linn. 1758 (with A. querquedula Linn 1758 as a syn.), Anas crecca Linn. 1758, Anas carolinensis Gmelin 1789, Anas formosa "Gmelin" = Georgi 1775, Anas hina Gmelin 1789, Anas manillensis Gmelin 1789, Anas novaehispaniae Gmelin 1789
Type fixation: tautonymy (p. 143 of OD)
Type species: Anas querquedula Linn. 1758 (Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.; p. 126; [OD])

(And Spatula Boie 1822 has priority for the group, indeed.)

Indeed, well, I sent you a PM for nothing. -_-

Or, I'd been thinking of an alternative :
A monotypic Querquedula,
Punanetta for puna, versicolor and hottentota and Spatula for the remaining.
 
Last edited:
A monotypic Querquedula,
Punanetta for puna, versicolor and hottentota and Spatula for the remaining.
There is two zoonomen Richmond’s cards for Punanetta. One says the type is Anas puna Licht. The other says type is Anas leucogenis Von Tschudi by monotypy.
"A monotypic Querquedula,
Punanetta for puna, versicolor and hottentota" That is how Wolters has it in Die Vogelarten der Erde. He has clyeata, discors, cyanoptera, patelea, rhynchotis, capensis, in Spatula.
 
A monotypic Querquedula,
Punanetta for puna, versicolor and hottentota and Spatula for the remaining.
There is two zoonomen Richmond’s cards for Punanetta. One says the type is Anas puna Licht. The other says type is Anas leucogenis Von Tschudi by monotypy.
This is a slightly problematic case.

Punanetta Bonaparte 1856
Bonaparte CL. 1856. Excursion dans les divers musées d'Allemagne, de Hollande et de Belgique (suite et fin), et Tableaux paralléliques de l'ordre des Palmipèdes. C.-R. Séan. Hebd. Acad. Sci. Paris 43:643-652.; p. 649; [OD]
Originally included nominal species: Anas leucogenys Tschudi 1843 (with A. puna "Lichtenstein" = Tschudi 1844 as a syn.)
Type fixation: original monotypy
Type species: Anas leucogenys Tschudi 1843 (Tschudi JJ von. 1843. Diagnosen einiger neuer peruanischer Vögel. Arch. Naturgesch. 9(1):385-390.; p. 390; [OD]); arguably a misidentification for A. puna Tschudi 1844 (Tschudi JJ de. 1844. Avium conspectus, quae in Republica Peruana reperiuntur et pleraeque observatae vel collectae sunt in itinere. Arch. Naturgesch. 262-317; p. 315; [OD])

Type species now Merganetta armata leucogenys (Tschudi), making the generic name a junior synonym of Merganetta Gould 1841. ICZN 68.3: "Type species by monotypy. When an author establishes a new nominal genus-group taxon for a single taxonomic species and denotes that species by an available name, the nominal species so named is the type species.": it's the name that Bonaparte used as valid that determines the type, the synonyms are irrelevant.
Still, the generic name has been used traditionally as if A. puna Tschudi 1844 was the type, and Bonaparte's classification suggests this is indeed what he meant: he placed the genus among Anatidae: Anatinae, very far from Merganetta Gould (in Erismaturidae: Merganettinae, on p. 652 of the same work [here]). The identity of the type could (and probably should) be corrected under [Art.70.3 of the present Code] to match usage. (But, so far as I know, this has not been done yet.)
 
Last edited:
It seems that there is a replacement name for Punanetta : Adelonetta, what more can we say about this one?
Adelonetta Heine & Reichenow [1890]
Heine F, Reichenow A. 1882-1890. Nomenclator Musei Heineani Ornithologici; Verzeichniss der Vogel-Sammlung des Kgl. Oberamtmanns Ferdinand Heine. R Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin.; [OD]

This is a new name introduced on grounds of purism (see "[Punanetta (!) Bp. 1856]."; "puna" is not a classical word, hence viewed here as an unacceptable part of the generic name). The type is the same as that of the replaced name.
 
Last edited:
Wolters says that Punanetta includes Micronetta Robts. 1922.
Micronetta A. Roberts, Annals Transvaal Museum, VIII, Pt. 4, Oct. 30, 1922,. 204. Type, Anas punctata Burchell. [Anatidae.] (Original designation and monotypy.).


Type species : Anas punctata Burchell = Anas hottentota Eyton, 1838.
 
What will the new family sequence be? Mareca -> Anas -> Spatula -> Sibirionetta? Any changes to the species sequence within the families?

Maffong
 
What will the new family sequence be? Mareca -> Anas -> Spatula -> Sibirionetta? Any changes to the species sequence within the families?
AOU did Sibirionetta, Spatula, Mareca, Anas, which seems to be in agreement with mtDNA analyses (Sibirionetta sister to Spatula; Mareca sister to Anas; Sibirionetta+Spatula possibly sister to the S American group).
 
AOU did Sibirionetta, Spatula, Mareca, Anas, which seems to be in agreement with mtDNA analyses (Sibirionetta sister to Spatula; Mareca sister to Anas; Sibirionetta+Spatula possibly sister to the S American group).

Maybe we'll just have to wait until IOC finally decide, but perhaps someone there can tip us the wink? Frank?;););)
MJB
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top