Up until the release of the Swarovski 10x42 NL with its 133m Fov, I have always found that 10x didn't have enough Fov for what I wanted - particularly pairs of close circling raptors - it becomes very annoying (and easier to lose track of them) to only to be able to see one at a time. I even found this somewhat with the extra wide field (120m) Nikon MHG 10x42, and the Zeiss SF 10x42. I was expecting these AFov's to Wow me - but they don't really - not like I expected.
Even though the Swarovski 10x50 SV only has a 115m Fov I find it to be a bit of a Wow view. The combination of ease of view, 5mm EP, sharpness to the edge, an unexpectedly nice 3-D effect, and great ergonomics combine to make this an exceptionally nice view. I would have liked more Fov as explained, but the biggest drawback for me is that I like to walk around a lot, and really didn't want to lump 1 kg of bin. I will look forward to giving the new 10x42 NL a go, but expect I would prefer a harness for that walking for any length of time.
My 8x43 has 140m Fov which is nice, I wouldn't want to lose very much at all from that. The biggest benefits are 3/4 kg weight (really I would like 2/3 kg or less) , 5.3mm EP, fast (1 turn) focus, enough Fov to see both circling raptors, 'goldilocks' Dof which shows a definite focus point, but doesn't require chasing focus all over the sky when tracking erratic fast moving raptors, and the best ergonomics I have ever tried.
I think a combination of these factors translates into a nice ease of view in practice. I think the 8x shines in snap woodland viewing - enabling an off-axis id from a momentary, or fleeting glance. This is largely due to the EP, Dof, and Fov. I wear glasses so need appropriate ER too - it rules out a few of the older style bins, and is a real drawback in that kind of random viewing. I don't go in much for the lower powers as they don't really offer any extra Fov, or the larger image size I prefer, and I find I can get a bit lost with the best focus point sometimes.
I find even with these fantastic ergonomics that I notice shake when tackling difficult targets like the moons of Jupiter, hand held. It's not nearly so noticeable when bird watching. I can hold the 10x50 SV equally as steady. Interestingly the 12x50 SV doesn't seem as pleasant to use for me - being a bit more jittery at times.
At times I wish for both more Fov AND magnification than my 8x.
I think something like a 148m 9x45 weighing 2/3 kg is my personal holy grail
I would be interested on your thoughts of the 8x42 NL vs the 10x42 NL, and whether you think the 10x42 NL can cut it as a generalist one binocular solution to cover just about everything ...... ? :cat:
Chosun :gh: