• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Help ID this kingbird type Southern California (1 Viewer)

We’ve watched these birds in a palm tree for the past three months, they certainly have a nest and chase ravens away frequently. The babies have hatched and they are all still living around in surrounding trees. We are not sure if it is a western kingbird or a cassin’s or possibly a couch’s? Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 962F9604-03D1-425F-9890-BDF7377CF3B0.jpeg
    962F9604-03D1-425F-9890-BDF7377CF3B0.jpeg
    91.9 KB · Views: 55
Welcome to Birdforum. Hard, maybe impossible, to be sure from this photo, but I would guess Cassin's Kingbird.
 
Just based off of this photo, I'd say Cassin's (darker head than Western with more contrasting white behind bill) but there are exceptions all the time. I'd have to observe it more to be certain.
 
If you have observed it so much, can you describe how far up the front that the bird is truly yellow? At least the first image looks like it might be to just under the head which is far up for any of the two species mentioned. Another thing to look for is where does it have white on the tail: at the end or along the sides (or none at all)?

I am asking because with all due respect, these images are not the best.

Niels
 
One more pic

Thanks one more pic
I’m taking with my iPhone and zooming in
 

Attachments

  • 34ED4068-2CCB-4372-B1F9-81032CF4D3D7.jpg
    34ED4068-2CCB-4372-B1F9-81032CF4D3D7.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 13
  • 8A8E8963-7A3B-4148-8280-D152D9AB2974.jpg
    8A8E8963-7A3B-4148-8280-D152D9AB2974.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top