Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
More discoveries. NEW: Zeiss Victory SF 32

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Greater Sage-Grouse

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 3.50 average.
Old Wednesday 16th April 2003, 03:00   #1
bcurrie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 979
Greater Sage-Grouse

Don't want to be a hyprocrite, so I will be glad to post the first photo for critique.

These males are amazing. This is a very large bird, about 28 inches long. They only do their mating ritual at dawn. Mostly clear skies, the sun had been up for about 10 minutes.

Camera: Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS
Shooting Date/Time: April 5, 2003 6:41:30 AM
Shooting Mode: Manual
Shutter Speed: 1/1000
Aperture Value: 4.0
ISO Speed: 50
Lens: 10X optical zoom with B-300 and TCON 14
Image Stabilizer: On
Flash: Off
White Balance: Auto
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	greater sage-grouse (game) 133_3348 critique.jpg
Views:	360
Size:	99.6 KB
ID:	1334  
__________________
Brian

Last edited by bcurrie : Monday 12th January 2004 at 20:28.
bcurrie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 16th April 2003, 14:02   #2
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,866
Hi Brian,

A superb subject for a critque. A spectacular looking bird in a very nice setting. Composition wise it's fine but a few simple correction techniques would turn this into a first class photo.

It's a shame about that small dead bush showing through the tail feathers, they would be much more defined without it's presence. At present behind the bird is a little messy, but I appreciate that you can't just say 'stand over there whilst I take your photo'.

I'd be inclined to use a little unsharp mask, which will improve overall clarity by improving sharpness and contrast in one go realy bringing out the plumage detail and quite possibly separating the bird from the background a bit more.

I can appreciate that Grouse only display just after dawn which can give poor lighting levels. This has led to muddy coloured snow and too much blue cast in the shadows. Also I detect what looks to be a little CA on the top of the beak which gives a soft area where it should be sharp. This is easily corrected using the hue/saturation tool in Photoshop and I think Qimage can do this too. It just needs the blues saturation reducing, which will add grey to the shadows and whiten the snow.

I often like to give a photo a Neat Image, which I suspect will benefit this shot since the sampling background of snow is a different colour from the main subject. The Grouse would no doubt stand out even better.

Overall I really like the shot and with a few adjustments it can realise it's potential.

I gave it a two star rating as it stands, but with those corrections I'd boost it to three going on four.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 21:27   #3
paula
Registered User
 
paula's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 305
Marvellous subject, Brian!

What an amazing and wonderful bird, Brian.
The picture, on my monitor looks rather dull with a blue cast which happens easily with a snowy landscape. The bird itself could be a bit sharper as well.
I have been playing with the picture in PS and re-posted it with this post, and did the following:
Brightened it up with Levels
Desaturated the bluish cast with Replace colour
Selected the bird with the magic lasso and used USM sharpener
Inverted the selection and used Causian blur 0.7%
Put it in sRGB mode and saved the picture again.
I think in a smaller jpeg format.
Maybe someone will critique the above!
Ideally, the picture should have had a better exposure compensation whilst it was shot but I do not know how one should do that! On my camera I would look on the histogram after taking the picture and re-take it, but that may not be possible on every camera and anyhow, the bird might have flown by then!
I still think that the picture has great potential especially as the subject is so attractive.
Rating: 2 stars
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	brian\'s grouse.jpg
Views:	880
Size:	49.4 KB
ID:	1410  
__________________
paula
http://www.wildlifeandphoto.net
paula is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 26th April 2003, 21:33   #4
bcurrie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 979
Thank you both for those excellent critiques.

If you would like to see where I am at with it, go here
New and improved version???

I don't know if I am finished with it yet. Have to put it aside then come back to it for a fresh perspective.
__________________
Brian
bcurrie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.16134691 seconds with 16 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.