• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Ornamental feathers in Cretaceous Burmese amber (1 Viewer)

Fred Ruhe

Well-known member
Netherlands
Lida Xing, Pierre Cockx, Ryan C. McKellar and Jingmai O’Connor, 2018

Ornamental feathers in Cretaceous Burmese amber: resolving the enigma of rachis-dominated feather structure

Journal of Palaeogeography (2018) Journal 7 Article 13

Abstract: https://journalofpalaeogeography.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42501-018-0014-2

Over the last 20 years, compression fossils of feathers surrounding dinosaurs have greatly expanded our understanding of the origin and evolution of feathers. One of the most peculiar feather morphotypes discovered to date are rachis dominated feathers (RDFs), which have also been referred to as proximally ribbon-like pennaceous feathers (PRPFs). These elongate feathers are only found in the tail plumage, typically occurring in pairs with both streamer (not proximally ribbon-like) and racket-plume morphologies recognized. Here we describe a large sample set of isolated and paired RDFs from Upper Cretaceous Burmese amber (~ 99 Ma). Amber preserves the finest details of these fragile structures in three dimensions, demonstrating that RDFs form a distinct feather morphotype with a ventrally open rachis, and with significant variability in pigmentation, microstructure, and symmetry.

Keywords: Enantiornithes, Confuciusornithiformes, Fossil feather, Myanmar, Ornamental feather

Free pdf: https://journalofpalaeogeography.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s42501-018-0014-2

Enjoy,

Fred
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top