Could not agee with you more rob, just recieved my October issue & it's a super read.robhope said:I am very impressed with the new layout of Bird Watching magazine. I always look forward to getting my copy at the end of the month but the October issue has some new sections, better maps and a generally fresher feel.
robhope
Egrets, I've had a few.
Ruby said:Went looking for the tide tables this morning - they've gone!!
robhope said:I am very impressed with the new layout of Bird Watching magazine. I always look forward to getting my copy at the end of the month but the October issue has some new sections, better maps and a generally fresher feel.
robhope
Egrets, I've had a few.
the fresher feel comes from spacing articals/photos out, any fresher and the pages will be blank. sadly its going the way of most magazines today and has little real content, i will not be renewing my sub next year. its not for me.robhope said:I am very impressed with the new layout of Bird Watching magazine. I always look forward to getting my copy at the end of the month but the October issue has some new sections, better maps and a generally fresher feel.
robhope
Egrets, I've had a few.
Kevin W said:Hi all,
..... Tide tables - hmmm - that's three complaints about the lack of them now; I'll have to take a look at that one.
Best regards.
Kevin Wilmot
Editor, Bird Watching
Kevin W said:Tide tables back in for November issue.
Isn't reader feedback brilliant!
Regards.
Kevin
Kevin W said:'Beginners'' tips. I'm really keen to broaden the spectrum of the magazine and there will be beginners'/improvers' tips throughout the magazine, in panels and boxes which you can choose to read or not. The aim is that they won't be too intrusive for those people who don't want that type of information.
Editor, Bird Watching
hi kevin. with regards to spacing out. thumbing through this months copy of [birdwatching] there are large areas of white unprinted page/oversize margins etc, far to much, page after page even pointlessly oversize photos. it smacks of padding out,also i do not need to know what the birdwatching team would spend £5000 pounds on , nor do i need 70 mini photos on page 89, i could go on and on. the whole magazine could be printed on half the pages. its title suggests its a birdwatching magazine ? as to little real content. there are to many small articals, again spaced out, nothing to get your teeth into, for me sadly it is now a 5 minute read hardly worth picking up again. time i think to move to birdwatch, as i said. its not now for me , a few years ago maybe. i will not be renewing the sub. p.s. can you ask the printers not to cut the mag at an angle please [last months]. regards stuart.Kevin W said:Hi all,
Thanks for your kind words about the October issue of Bird watching magazine. I'm really happy that most of you seem to like it.
Making any changes to what is already a very popular magazine is never easy so I was keen to keep the core values of the mag - inspiration and information - while also making it look better and increasing the interaction between the mag and our readers. The result is something the editorial team are very proud of.
I appreciate that not everyone will be happy with it, and I'll take any criticisms on the chin. Tide tables - hmmm - that's three complaints about the lack of them now; I'll have to take a look at that one.
'Beginners'' tips. I'm really keen to broaden the spectrum of the magazine and there will be beginners'/improvers' tips throughout the magazine, in panels and boxes which you can choose to read or not. The aim is that they won't be too intrusive for those people who don't want that type of information.
And Stewart, I would love a more detailed version of your post about 'spacing articles/photos out' (whatever that means)! What exactly do you mean by 'little real content'?
Please carry on posting here with your comments (good or bad!), or you can always email me at the address in the magazine. I promise I'll reply!
Best regards.
Kevin Wilmot
Editor, Bird Watching