• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Some advice on flash use (1 Viewer)

TOF Trev

Well-known member
Whilst on holiday recently in Florida, I was lucky enough to visit Gatorland on a few occasions. Whilst there I noticed that a few photographers were using box type flash units on their cameras.

Any reasons for this in such good light, or could it just be to light up the chicks in nests in the bushes.

Just interested ;)
 
Last edited:
While I personally prefer not to use fill flash, that's the primary reason flash is used in sunny daylight - to fill in the shadow areas of the bird - especially shooting in the early afternoon where light is coming down from above, so areas like underwing and tail, and under the bill, can be in shadow. Also, the flash provides a 'catchlight' - that little glint in the eye that gives it some dimensionality and life as opposed to it being a dark orb.

It's all in the photographer's preferences - if looking to document birds to see their every detail and pattern, the flash can be useful in making sure details aren't lost or obscured to shadow. If looking for those 'Audubon' type shots, where the bird is perfectly illuminated like a drawing, it can be useful as well. Other photographers might actually prefer the real-life type look of the bird, shadows and all, as that provides a fully realistic setting and lighting situation as it was spotted on scene - personally I like the way shadows can add drama and reality, and a fleetingness, to the bird image, so I prefer to let my shadows be and never use flash. Neither is a wrong way to do it - all in the photographer's personal taste and desire!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top