Swissboy said:
It'll be interesting to see whether this scope fills a true need. In a way, its objective diameter is not that much above a 42mm type of binoculars. And the EDIII with its 60mm lens is already a very lightweight scope, but with better resolution due to this larger objective diameter. Thus, a 50mm ED scope will be a really good thing only for those - overall rare - occasions when one has to restrict one's luggage to such an extent that only 20 or 25mm binoculars plus this new scope fit in. And even this small scope can only deliver if one uses a sufficiently sturdy tripod.
But then, maybe users of the present crop of small (below 60mm) scopes can provide some arguments? I'd like to hear about them.
I have been reading the comments and advice on here for a while now. I have bought a used Nikon Fieldscope ED 50 with 2 eyepieces, (old type), 20-45x Zoom & 30x wide, case, and used Manfrotto tripod for £325 GBP.
Considering I had the following on my list I'm well pleased with it: -
Nikon Fieldscope ED111
Swarovski ATS 65mm HD
Zeiss 65
Pentax PF 65mm ED
Opticron GS665 GA
The Opticron is the cheapest, but the rest average out at around £820 with 30x eyepiece & stay on case.
However, consider the following: -
I was trying to keep the weight down as we walk and cycle on most of our trips, equipment not used much from vehicles.
I do acknowledge that it will be inferior to a larger scope in poor light conditions and longer distances.
I could not tell much difference between the Nikon and a top of the range Kowa scope, not enough to warrant the extra weight.
I can see much more than my Opticron Verano 8 x 42 binoculars so I'm happy.
Spend as much time as you can choosing and take someone with you for a second opinion.
Thanks to everyone who posted information and advice here, it has helped make a much better purchase. Much appreciated.
Cheers,
Harry.