pluvanut
DOCG
charliecapp said:Weird. So there you have it. Anyone who knows these binocs, swears by these binocs. From guys in the business of testing optics (Steven Ingram) to all the serious birders that subscribe to this forum. I have birded with a very nice pair of poro prisms (B&L Custom 8x36) and waterproofing has never been an issue. Who birds in the pouring rain?? The SE's are wonderfully light compared to any high-end 42mm binocs. They have a remarkable field of view. You can buy 3 pairs of SE 8x32 for the price of 1 Swarovski 8.5x42. All of this obviously begs the question: Why isn't this the best selling pair of serious birding binoculars hands down?? That's what's weird. It doesn't matter to me. They have a cult following and I like the idea of joining a cult. This is one of the healthier ones I can think of.
Some discussion you started! I think the point about physiology is a good one. I was 40 years and engineer and quite numerate. Every time I tried to get into the theory of optics, I gave up quickly - mind boggling.
I think we are also up against siciology, psychology, mythology, marketing.
One of the things that governs what we use is industrial economics. Manufacturers put their time and money into developing what will sell in volume, which inevitably to compromise; performance, portability etc so we havea bunch of products all competing for the same market, governed by basic laws of physics.
Surely it must be true that for a given standard of technology a big objective should be better in low light than a little one, but I guess we may be talking about MUCH bigger, 50 or 60 mm?which takes us out of the popular range. Not only is this bound to be heavier for simple size, but is out of the popular range, so the development cost has to be spread over fewer sales. Result big, heavy and very, very expensive bins - all depends how dark you need to go on seeing.
Every once in a while one a product becomes a classic. So why is the SE still obscure? Marketing reasons is my guess viz. the Nikon website. SE's earlier brother, the 'E' was long promoted as the best bin at any price by a well known British dealer. Nikon need to sell HG's - or is that too cynical?
Oh well - back to the other 'ology - ornitholgy, best of the lot.
In my eyes, SE's are the best because when I use them I forget that there is glass between me and the bird. There may be others, but not at the price I think.
Welcome to the cult.