Vortex Diamondback '09' 8x42

the_handy_andy · Sunday 12th July 2009, 11:00

Anyone got a pair of these? if yes how do you rate them?

Andrew

FrankD · Sunday 12th July 2009, 14:54

Andrew,

The buzz was over the newer configurations (7x36 and 9x36). I don't think anyone purchased the newere 8x42s IIRC. I would not mind grabbing a pair to see how they compare with my impressions on the older model.

ceasar · Sunday 12th July 2009, 23:44

I don't have the new 8 x 42's. I have the new 9 x 36's and the old 8 x 42's. I can tell you that the new ones will be brighter. The new 9 x 36's are brighter than the old 8 x 42's. The new ones have coatings on the Objectives that have a distinctive Purple undertone (or overtone, if you will.) This is different from the old coatings. They are just as solidly contructed as the older models.
Bob

FrankD · Sunday 12th July 2009, 23:50

Bob,

That is saying a lot in my opinion considering the smaller objective and greater magnification of the 9x36s. I wonder if the apparent centerfield sharpness has improved any.

ceasar · Monday 13th July 2009, 00:31

Frank,
Improvement in brightness is not hard to discern. As far as sharpness, not much, if any, as far as I can tell. They are at their best in sunny conditions. They are sharp enough, but are at a disadvantage. The only ones I have to compare them with are my 10x's for the most part and the 8 x 32 SE. They can't match up to the 10 x 35 EII, which is to be expected, nor the 10 x 32 LX L or 10 x 42 SE of course. They are clearly better than the Pentax 9 x 28 in sharpness, brightness and contrast and the old 10 x 32 Eagle Platinum/Raven; and they come close to holding their own against the Minox 10 x 32 BDBR Asph, especially on edges, but the 10x advantage is evident and they are not as bright. Contrast is better with the older Alphas.

If I can complete some personal items soon, I hope to have a more detailed report shortly.
Bob

FrankD · Monday 13th July 2009, 00:55

Thank you Bob. I look forward to it.

You are commenting on the 9x36, yes?

ceasar · Tuesday 14th July 2009, 01:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrankD

Thank you Bob. I look forward to it.

You are commenting on the 9x36, yes?

Yes.
Bob

Sunday 12th July 2009, 11:00	#1
the_handy_andy Registered User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Shropshire, UK Posts: 49	Vortex Diamondback '09' 8x42 Anyone got a pair of these? if yes how do you rate them? Andrew

Sunday 12th July 2009, 23:44	#3
ceasar Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Pennsylvania Posts: 11,068	I don't have the new 8 x 42's. I have the new 9 x 36's and the old 8 x 42's. I can tell you that the new ones will be brighter. The new 9 x 36's are brighter than the old 8 x 42's. The new ones have coatings on the Objectives that have a distinctive Purple undertone (or overtone, if you will.) This is different from the old coatings. They are just as solidly contructed as the older models. Bob Last edited by ceasar : Sunday 12th July 2009 at 23:52.
	BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Monday 13th July 2009, 00:31	#5
ceasar Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Pennsylvania Posts: 11,068	Frank, Improvement in brightness is not hard to discern. As far as sharpness, not much, if any, as far as I can tell. They are at their best in sunny conditions. They are sharp enough, but are at a disadvantage. The only ones I have to compare them with are my 10x's for the most part and the 8 x 32 SE. They can't match up to the 10 x 35 EII, which is to be expected, nor the 10 x 32 LX L or 10 x 42 SE of course. They are clearly better than the Pentax 9 x 28 in sharpness, brightness and contrast and the old 10 x 32 Eagle Platinum/Raven; and they come close to holding their own against the Minox 10 x 32 BDBR Asph, especially on edges, but the 10x advantage is evident and they are not as bright. Contrast is better with the older Alphas. If I can complete some personal items soon, I hope to have a more detailed report shortly. Bob Last edited by ceasar : Monday 13th July 2009 at 00:41.
	BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Vortex Diamondback vs Vortex Viper	jbetz	Vortex	6	Sunday 24th May 2009 03:37
Vortex Diamondback 7x and 9x	Tero	Vortex	4	Wednesday 11th March 2009 01:27
Nikon Monarch ATB 8x42 vs Vortex Viper 8x42 vs Leupold Golden Ring 8x42 vs others	cnybirder	Binoculars	18	Tuesday 18th March 2008 14:18
Vortex Diamondback/Stokes Talon	SouthTXBirder	Binoculars	24	Tuesday 21st August 2007 00:01

Sunday 12th July 2009, 14:54	#2
FrankD Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Eastern Pennsylvania Posts: 8,386	Andrew, The buzz was over the newer configurations (7x36 and 9x36). I don't think anyone purchased the newere 8x42s IIRC. I would not mind grabbing a pair to see how they compare with my impressions on the older model.

Sunday 12th July 2009, 23:50	#4
FrankD Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Eastern Pennsylvania Posts: 8,386	Bob, That is saying a lot in my opinion considering the smaller objective and greater magnification of the 9x36s. I wonder if the apparent centerfield sharpness has improved any.

Monday 13th July 2009, 00:55	#6
FrankD Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Eastern Pennsylvania Posts: 8,386	Thank you Bob. I look forward to it. You are commenting on the 9x36, yes?