What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
100-400mm truth or myth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony_79" data-source="post: 1863359" data-attributes="member: 86917"><p>David, I have very similar experience. My 100-400 is sharp enough at wide open. It sharpens only very minimally when stopped down to f/7.1-f/8 (and it requires 100% crop to see that difference). Down to 50-70% crop and there is no difference.</p><p></p><p>Once I removed the front lens assembly, there was dust inside and i just wanted to clean it (yes, i know those dust particles are only cosmetic trouble, does not affect image quality).</p><p></p><p>However there was somekind of mechanism that will let you calibrate front lens distance in realtion to the secondary lens assemblies. </p><p>I have no idea if it has something to do with image quality/lens calibration... It was sealed and tightened to one position. I left it original position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony_79, post: 1863359, member: 86917"] David, I have very similar experience. My 100-400 is sharp enough at wide open. It sharpens only very minimally when stopped down to f/7.1-f/8 (and it requires 100% crop to see that difference). Down to 50-70% crop and there is no difference. Once I removed the front lens assembly, there was dust inside and i just wanted to clean it (yes, i know those dust particles are only cosmetic trouble, does not affect image quality). However there was somekind of mechanism that will let you calibrate front lens distance in realtion to the secondary lens assemblies. I have no idea if it has something to do with image quality/lens calibration... It was sealed and tightened to one position. I left it original position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
100-400mm truth or myth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top