What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
10x and 12x SE's, holdability differs much?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CLRobles" data-source="post: 1626138" data-attributes="member: 76360"><p>Ning I agree without a doubt! The 8x32 is a better birding bin and does show less CA due to less power. When I would take both out to the wetland preserve in Albuquerque the 8x would show almost no CA when looking at geese on the lake. Their black neck against the light blue reflection of the lake was a tough chore for any bin and the 8x did very good job at controlling CA in these conditions. When the geese were kept in the sweet spot almost no CA could be detected and there was definitely no objection to the view. What a beautiful view!</p><p>When I would use the 10x SE in the same circumstance it would definitely magnify the CA. Now to me, with the 10's, the CA was pronounced but still acceptable. I still enjoyed the view but it was there and you could see it!</p><p>Now that you have the 8x and 10x SE you KNOW you have to get the 12x SE :-O.... Your hooked on SE's Ning :-O Don't try to deny it Ning, that is the first sign of addiction:-O </p><p>but really the 12's are still something to be sought after and really an amazing bin! But when talking CA the 12's due to the magnification really start to show. When I would turn them to the same geese they would really show CA and I didn't care for the view :C. </p><p>But this is just one area and one aspect of the 12x50SE and of the 10x42SE. They come into their own in other fields and excel much better than the 8x32 does. As you probably know I am a hunter and the 10's and 12's completely outshine the 8's in low light resolution and distant game observation. Remember in these conditions CA is rarely if ever seen because there is no drastic background lighting differences. Mostly just greens, grays, and browns.... And when it come to astronomy the 12x SE is almost as talked about as the 8x SE is in birding! </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wellllll I'm definitely getting older:'D:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CLRobles, post: 1626138, member: 76360"] Ning I agree without a doubt! The 8x32 is a better birding bin and does show less CA due to less power. When I would take both out to the wetland preserve in Albuquerque the 8x would show almost no CA when looking at geese on the lake. Their black neck against the light blue reflection of the lake was a tough chore for any bin and the 8x did very good job at controlling CA in these conditions. When the geese were kept in the sweet spot almost no CA could be detected and there was definitely no objection to the view. What a beautiful view! When I would use the 10x SE in the same circumstance it would definitely magnify the CA. Now to me, with the 10's, the CA was pronounced but still acceptable. I still enjoyed the view but it was there and you could see it! Now that you have the 8x and 10x SE you KNOW you have to get the 12x SE :-O.... Your hooked on SE's Ning :-O Don't try to deny it Ning, that is the first sign of addiction:-O but really the 12's are still something to be sought after and really an amazing bin! But when talking CA the 12's due to the magnification really start to show. When I would turn them to the same geese they would really show CA and I didn't care for the view :C. But this is just one area and one aspect of the 12x50SE and of the 10x42SE. They come into their own in other fields and excel much better than the 8x32 does. As you probably know I am a hunter and the 10's and 12's completely outshine the 8's in low light resolution and distant game observation. Remember in these conditions CA is rarely if ever seen because there is no drastic background lighting differences. Mostly just greens, grays, and browns.... And when it come to astronomy the 12x SE is almost as talked about as the 8x SE is in birding! Wellllll I'm definitely getting older:'D: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
10x and 12x SE's, holdability differs much?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top