What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
10x32 advice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pinewood" data-source="post: 3837985" data-attributes="member: 10255"><p>Hello Wachi,</p><p></p><p>I recall reading a study, sent to me my Elkcub, an academic study of binocular use. The authors found no verification for the idea that a larger binocular was held steadier because of the mass. My <strong>personal </strong>experience among the Zeiss ClassiC 10x40, the Leica BN 10x50 and the Zeiss 10x32 FL, was that the latter was the easiest to hold steady. I have no experience with the SF binocular which is praised for its balance. So I do not consider it a "big true," but I am not dismissing it as myth. People differ in perception and in ergonomics.</p><p></p><p>Optically, the A-K prisms have higher transmission because the prism surfaces do not require reflective coating. The S-P design may be both more compact and lighter but it is not inherently better optically. Problems of transmission inherent in the earliest versions have been mostly resolved with dielectric mirrors.</p><p></p><p>Happy bird watching,</p><p>Arthur :hi:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pinewood, post: 3837985, member: 10255"] Hello Wachi, I recall reading a study, sent to me my Elkcub, an academic study of binocular use. The authors found no verification for the idea that a larger binocular was held steadier because of the mass. My [B]personal [/B]experience among the Zeiss ClassiC 10x40, the Leica BN 10x50 and the Zeiss 10x32 FL, was that the latter was the easiest to hold steady. I have no experience with the SF binocular which is praised for its balance. So I do not consider it a "big true," but I am not dismissing it as myth. People differ in perception and in ergonomics. Optically, the A-K prisms have higher transmission because the prism surfaces do not require reflective coating. The S-P design may be both more compact and lighter but it is not inherently better optically. Problems of transmission inherent in the earliest versions have been mostly resolved with dielectric mirrors. Happy bird watching, Arthur :hi: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
10x32 advice
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top