What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denco@comcast.n" data-source="post: 3495989" data-attributes="member: 25300"><p>"I know now the 10x50 SV is a tad sharper, has a wider AFOV and is brighter (Yes Dennis, Still a definite keeper)."</p><p></p><p>An AFOV of 66 degrees versus 65 degrees does not make much difference. I don't see that much drop off on the edges of the Canon's like you do either. The Canon is like the Zeiss SF in that it strikes a better balance between edge sharpness and RB. The SV has a slight drop off in sharpness as you approach the edges also. I believe it is called the Absam Ring. I don't see much difference in the AFOV between the two. As far as sharpness I don't see that either. Did you do any doublers or resolution tests to verify that? Anyway once the IS is engaged the Canon leaves the SV in the dust as far as resolution or sharpness is concerned with at least a 30% advantage in seeing detail. The 10x50 SV could be a little brighter because of the bigger aperture but I think you are seeing differences in color with the Swarovski being more neutral. The SV has the disadvantage of producing a slight bit of RB ,whereas, I see none in the Canon 10x42 IS-L. The Canon's pans more naturally than the SV because of that. For most people depending on their IPD setting the Canon will also produce a better 3D image than the 10x50 SV. Also, the Canon has better glare control than the SV and a much smoother, less sticky focus than the SV. When I compared the two which was no too long ago the Canon controlled CA better than 10x50 SV with none in the center and very little at the edges. So if you don't like CA get the Canon. Optically, the Canon has most of the advantages with the IS being HUGE but the SV does have better ergonomics for most people. If you want the best steady, sharpest view with the most resolution and the ability to see detail nothing approaches the Canon 10x42 IS-L. Nothing!:t:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denco@comcast.n, post: 3495989, member: 25300"] "I know now the 10x50 SV is a tad sharper, has a wider AFOV and is brighter (Yes Dennis, Still a definite keeper)." An AFOV of 66 degrees versus 65 degrees does not make much difference. I don't see that much drop off on the edges of the Canon's like you do either. The Canon is like the Zeiss SF in that it strikes a better balance between edge sharpness and RB. The SV has a slight drop off in sharpness as you approach the edges also. I believe it is called the Absam Ring. I don't see much difference in the AFOV between the two. As far as sharpness I don't see that either. Did you do any doublers or resolution tests to verify that? Anyway once the IS is engaged the Canon leaves the SV in the dust as far as resolution or sharpness is concerned with at least a 30% advantage in seeing detail. The 10x50 SV could be a little brighter because of the bigger aperture but I think you are seeing differences in color with the Swarovski being more neutral. The SV has the disadvantage of producing a slight bit of RB ,whereas, I see none in the Canon 10x42 IS-L. The Canon's pans more naturally than the SV because of that. For most people depending on their IPD setting the Canon will also produce a better 3D image than the 10x50 SV. Also, the Canon has better glare control than the SV and a much smoother, less sticky focus than the SV. When I compared the two which was no too long ago the Canon controlled CA better than 10x50 SV with none in the center and very little at the edges. So if you don't like CA get the Canon. Optically, the Canon has most of the advantages with the IS being HUGE but the SV does have better ergonomics for most people. If you want the best steady, sharpest view with the most resolution and the ability to see detail nothing approaches the Canon 10x42 IS-L. Nothing!:t: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top