What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3499935" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>This morning I looked at Orion.</p><p>The star images are really good over nearly the whole quite flat field.</p><p>At the edge there is vignetting, but depending on position angle. At some positions quite a lot more than at others.</p><p>In addition some edge stars are elongated but this seems to depend on the offset of the variprisms. At some positions stars are very good at the edge.</p><p></p><p>I was pleased and surprised to see 4 Trapezium stars. Tiny points of light. This is fairly easy in 18x50, but it was just above 5 bulkhead light fittings each full moon brightness.</p><p>In addition a new building 22 metres away has had a Rottweiler light on all night for a week. This is 20 to 40 times full moon, i.e. magnitude minus 16.5.</p><p>I have stopped complaining as I consider planet Earth a lost cause. My friend thinks there will be no humans here in 150 years, and I don't disagree with him.</p><p>However, someone did complain as this morning the light was angled 45 degrees downwards.</p><p></p><p>The Canon 10x42 L is very good but heavy and bulky. The IS worked well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3499935, member: 111403"] This morning I looked at Orion. The star images are really good over nearly the whole quite flat field. At the edge there is vignetting, but depending on position angle. At some positions quite a lot more than at others. In addition some edge stars are elongated but this seems to depend on the offset of the variprisms. At some positions stars are very good at the edge. I was pleased and surprised to see 4 Trapezium stars. Tiny points of light. This is fairly easy in 18x50, but it was just above 5 bulkhead light fittings each full moon brightness. In addition a new building 22 metres away has had a Rottweiler light on all night for a week. This is 20 to 40 times full moon, i.e. magnitude minus 16.5. I have stopped complaining as I consider planet Earth a lost cause. My friend thinks there will be no humans here in 150 years, and I don't disagree with him. However, someone did complain as this morning the light was angled 45 degrees downwards. The Canon 10x42 L is very good but heavy and bulky. The IS worked well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top