What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ailevin" data-source="post: 3500891" data-attributes="member: 140149"><p>Binastro,</p><p></p><p>I appreciate the additional information, and you have inspired me to try the trapezium in my 15x45 IS as soon as the sky clears. I started astronomical observing only as an adult when one of my sons became interested in astronomy. Early on, hunting double stars with my 7x50 binoculars was one of my favorite activities when not under dark skies. In those days the limiting factor was holding the binocular steady and I was lucky to glimpse a 25"-30" split of stars with relatively similar magnitudes. </p><p></p><p>I doubt I have the necessary acuity as I normally think of around 2 arc minutes as the lower limit of apparent resolution, but perhaps I am selling myself short. I have certainly seen a great range in variation in the ability to detect faint stars in the same field of the same telescope by different observers. We had a very gifted comet observer in our club years ago, and he literally taught me to see things in my own telescope that I had no idea were there.</p><p></p><p>Alan</p><p></p><p>P.S. The smallest binocular star images I have seen are in Fujinon Meibo 7x50.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ailevin, post: 3500891, member: 140149"] Binastro, I appreciate the additional information, and you have inspired me to try the trapezium in my 15x45 IS as soon as the sky clears. I started astronomical observing only as an adult when one of my sons became interested in astronomy. Early on, hunting double stars with my 7x50 binoculars was one of my favorite activities when not under dark skies. In those days the limiting factor was holding the binocular steady and I was lucky to glimpse a 25"-30" split of stars with relatively similar magnitudes. I doubt I have the necessary acuity as I normally think of around 2 arc minutes as the lower limit of apparent resolution, but perhaps I am selling myself short. I have certainly seen a great range in variation in the ability to detect faint stars in the same field of the same telescope by different observers. We had a very gifted comet observer in our club years ago, and he literally taught me to see things in my own telescope that I had no idea were there. Alan P.S. The smallest binocular star images I have seen are in Fujinon Meibo 7x50. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
10X42L IS Pros/cons...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top