What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
10x50 EL or 10x54 HT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gijs van Ginkel" data-source="post: 3370198" data-attributes="member: 82596"><p>Hermann, post 49,</p><p>My "objective"parameters in favor of the SLC are: slightly brighter (on measured transmission data and visual inspection), larger FOV (136m/1000m versus 130 m/1000m) larger eyerelief (18,5 mm versus 15,5 mm).</p><p>Subjective is certainly: handling comfort, but that is for my taste almost the same, Yes, the SLC weighs 30 grams more, but that is hardly noticeable in my hands. I prefer the screw mount of the eyecups of the SLC over the bajonet mount of the Leica, but I will agree with you that this is a matter of taste also.</p><p>I do not share your higher appreciation of the focussing mechanism of the Leica, both have their own merits and I found them both smooth and pleasant to use.</p><p>Yes, the Leica is a bit smaller than the SLC, but that is not a lot. The close focus of both binoculars is almost equal. That of the SLC is even a bit smaller (2,8 m versus 3 m), but that is really a "peanut"difference.</p><p>And considering that the SLC is 450 euros cheaper in The Netherlands than the Leica makes the decision for quite a few people easier I think.</p><p>Gijs van Ginkel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gijs van Ginkel, post: 3370198, member: 82596"] Hermann, post 49, My "objective"parameters in favor of the SLC are: slightly brighter (on measured transmission data and visual inspection), larger FOV (136m/1000m versus 130 m/1000m) larger eyerelief (18,5 mm versus 15,5 mm). Subjective is certainly: handling comfort, but that is for my taste almost the same, Yes, the SLC weighs 30 grams more, but that is hardly noticeable in my hands. I prefer the screw mount of the eyecups of the SLC over the bajonet mount of the Leica, but I will agree with you that this is a matter of taste also. I do not share your higher appreciation of the focussing mechanism of the Leica, both have their own merits and I found them both smooth and pleasant to use. Yes, the Leica is a bit smaller than the SLC, but that is not a lot. The close focus of both binoculars is almost equal. That of the SLC is even a bit smaller (2,8 m versus 3 m), but that is really a "peanut"difference. And considering that the SLC is 450 euros cheaper in The Netherlands than the Leica makes the decision for quite a few people easier I think. Gijs van Ginkel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
10x50 EL or 10x54 HT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top