What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
12x50 options
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adhoc" data-source="post: 3481381" data-attributes="member: 131373"><p>I am not sure whether your post is directly for Pinewood/Arthur or me but I will respond. In the meantime we have the interesting comments above by Typo/David.</p><p></p><p>We see that for Arthur there is a significant difference between even 10x mounted and 12x mounted; I have cautioned about adding a 12x just for mounted use if one already has a 10x because the increase in image detail versus 10x mounted might possibly not be worth that. I should think that to anyone the difference between 8x mounted and 12x mounted will be striking. To me (as an individual user) there is no gain in mounting an 8x. There is some steadying but at the distance at which this makes a visible difference the subject is too far for an 8x image to convey more useful detail. With 10x mounted versus 10x handheld, however, there is a significant difference in image detail. There is a further improvement with 12x mounted over 10x mounted. Thus the difference between 12x mounted and 8x mounted will be that much greater.</p><p></p><p>A 15x will have the disadvantage that it is very difficult to use handheld. About this there are many comments like David's on the internet. (I have negative experience with one 16x model.)</p><p></p><p>The handheld use of 12x is difficult for some, but found quite easy by others, of even average or slight build. We see this in David's recent review of the Meopta HD 12x50, and this video of its Cabelas version, which although by less of an expert conveys that well: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrBk2nKius" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrBk2nKius</a>. It seems that across varying size and strength of users heavier weight (up to a point) in a binocular of about 12x power can actually help make it steadier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adhoc, post: 3481381, member: 131373"] I am not sure whether your post is directly for Pinewood/Arthur or me but I will respond. In the meantime we have the interesting comments above by Typo/David. We see that for Arthur there is a significant difference between even 10x mounted and 12x mounted; I have cautioned about adding a 12x just for mounted use if one already has a 10x because the increase in image detail versus 10x mounted might possibly not be worth that. I should think that to anyone the difference between 8x mounted and 12x mounted will be striking. To me (as an individual user) there is no gain in mounting an 8x. There is some steadying but at the distance at which this makes a visible difference the subject is too far for an 8x image to convey more useful detail. With 10x mounted versus 10x handheld, however, there is a significant difference in image detail. There is a further improvement with 12x mounted over 10x mounted. Thus the difference between 12x mounted and 8x mounted will be that much greater. A 15x will have the disadvantage that it is very difficult to use handheld. About this there are many comments like David's on the internet. (I have negative experience with one 16x model.) The handheld use of 12x is difficult for some, but found quite easy by others, of even average or slight build. We see this in David's recent review of the Meopta HD 12x50, and this video of its Cabelas version, which although by less of an expert conveys that well: [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrBk2nKius[/url]. It seems that across varying size and strength of users heavier weight (up to a point) in a binocular of about 12x power can actually help make it steadier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
12x50 options
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top