What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
2.1x42 Any use for birds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3544564" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>I have ordered some Nikon TC-E2, so will see if it works for me.</p><p>I may need to use my Minolta viewfinder correction dioptres, although my left eye might be O.K. without, at least at night.</p><p>I don't know if I can make the two converters truly parallel.</p><p></p><p>Afocal adaptors seem difficult to make well.</p><p>Zeiss resorted to radioactive glass for a 1.7x Mutar??, the only use by Zeiss of such glass that I found.</p><p></p><p>I had a Panagor?? fish eye adaptor that worked very well with stopped down lenses on my Minolta.</p><p>This is the only lens that ever cracked in minus 25C to minus 30C weather. The Minolta lenses were fine.</p><p>I think that the metal front cell contracted and broke the very curved front element.</p><p></p><p>16mm f/2.8 Minolta full frame fisheye lenses and probably others seem to have more or less front afocal lenses.</p><p></p><p>The rangefinder cameras with leaf shutters had 35mm, 45 or 50mm and 85mm lenses using interchangeable front halves. Never as good as a good fixed lens.</p><p>The 1950s Minolta 50mm f/1.8 or 45mm f/1.8 rangefinder lens was staggeringly good. Possibly a Minolta A?? camera.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3544564, member: 111403"] I have ordered some Nikon TC-E2, so will see if it works for me. I may need to use my Minolta viewfinder correction dioptres, although my left eye might be O.K. without, at least at night. I don't know if I can make the two converters truly parallel. Afocal adaptors seem difficult to make well. Zeiss resorted to radioactive glass for a 1.7x Mutar??, the only use by Zeiss of such glass that I found. I had a Panagor?? fish eye adaptor that worked very well with stopped down lenses on my Minolta. This is the only lens that ever cracked in minus 25C to minus 30C weather. The Minolta lenses were fine. I think that the metal front cell contracted and broke the very curved front element. 16mm f/2.8 Minolta full frame fisheye lenses and probably others seem to have more or less front afocal lenses. The rangefinder cameras with leaf shutters had 35mm, 45 or 50mm and 85mm lenses using interchangeable front halves. Never as good as a good fixed lens. The 1950s Minolta 50mm f/1.8 or 45mm f/1.8 rangefinder lens was staggeringly good. Possibly a Minolta A?? camera. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
2.1x42 Any use for birds?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top