Vincent van der Spek
Well-known member
Arjan Dwarshuis, Dutch Birding: January 1-4.
Re Hypocolius. If heard-only records are considered acceptable for a big year, then I'd say that seeing a distant "compact flock of long tailed birds with rounded wings" departing an established Hypocolius roost site ought to be good enough (although arguably unsatisfactory for a life list).
Thanks for trying to add another bird, but I'd wouldn't say so, Richard: it's about being very confident about every identification: have you positively recorded a species, either heard or seen?
You can often be absolutely certain about a heard-only. But with lousy views... I agree with Arjan that he needs more than 'it looks like it, I can't think of anything else, so it must be the real deal'. o
On Jan the 1st we had a calling Rock/Water Pipit (fly-by) before sunset. Habitat was most suitable - I'd say 99,9% diagnostic - for Rock. He didn't tick it. Fortunately we found both species later that day (1 of each: justice!).
So you can't be critical enough. Especially in his case, as a potential record needs to be "beyond doubt" *
Cheers!
PS still no internet there it seems
* personal note, slightly off-topic: no matter how critical you are about ID's, at places on the globe where you have little or no experience, you're bound to make mistakes. On trips I sometimes get the comment of being over-critical (I e.g. refuse to tick many Empidonax flycatchers in the Neo-tropics, even in the (rare) cases I've hired a guide and the bird is pointed out to me). Still I have no illusions that my life list is a 100% pure. I hope (and think) it's very close, but a 100% ? I still need to meet the first birder that is free of mistakes even in his or her own country. World travellers that think their lists are pure, are overestimating their skills I'm afraid.


