What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
300f2.8 / 500F4 Dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RJM" data-source="post: 1580049" data-attributes="member: 66340"><p>Seems like a plan. The 500mm F4P (if that is what you mean about flight shots) manual focus will drive you mad with randomly moving creatures that don't stay still. On the other hand I think it is lighter and better balanced than the bowling ball-like 300 F2.8! If you are going to do much walking perhaps the 300mm F4 might be a better compromise. Certainly easier on the wallet.</p><p> </p><p>I prefer the flexibility of a zoom for proper framing when close in so went with a Sigma 150-500mm. The optical stabilisation let's me walk-about without being burdened with a tripod too. For well-lit targets under 20m I think the IQ can be just as good as the best prime lens. But I never print larger than 8x10 or view at higher rez than my HD TV.</p><p> </p><p>have fun!</p><p>Rick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RJM, post: 1580049, member: 66340"] Seems like a plan. The 500mm F4P (if that is what you mean about flight shots) manual focus will drive you mad with randomly moving creatures that don't stay still. On the other hand I think it is lighter and better balanced than the bowling ball-like 300 F2.8! If you are going to do much walking perhaps the 300mm F4 might be a better compromise. Certainly easier on the wallet. I prefer the flexibility of a zoom for proper framing when close in so went with a Sigma 150-500mm. The optical stabilisation let's me walk-about without being burdened with a tripod too. For well-lit targets under 20m I think the IQ can be just as good as the best prime lens. But I never print larger than 8x10 or view at higher rez than my HD TV. have fun! Rick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
300f2.8 / 500F4 Dilemma
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top