What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
300f2.8 / 500F4 Dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rdspalm" data-source="post: 1587310" data-attributes="member: 1849"><p>Martin, I'd hate the thought of carrying a 500mm monster around all day unless I was going to a civilized hide like at Titchwell. A 500mm lens is only really suitable for a sturdy tripod with a specialized gimbals type head. If you invest all that money and want decent photos, then its the tripod. I carted my 300mm 2.8VR and TC round Cley in May trying to get a decent shot of the Bearded Tits. I was using a monopod that day which helped but the thought "Why am I doing this?" did occur at times.</p><p></p><p>I'm going to Hungary birding in 2 weeks and will be taking the photo gear, but I'm not going to become a slave to it. I intend to to use a Kata rucsac to achieve a bit of comfort between shoots.</p><p></p><p>Richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rdspalm, post: 1587310, member: 1849"] Martin, I'd hate the thought of carrying a 500mm monster around all day unless I was going to a civilized hide like at Titchwell. A 500mm lens is only really suitable for a sturdy tripod with a specialized gimbals type head. If you invest all that money and want decent photos, then its the tripod. I carted my 300mm 2.8VR and TC round Cley in May trying to get a decent shot of the Bearded Tits. I was using a monopod that day which helped but the thought "Why am I doing this?" did occur at times. I'm going to Hungary birding in 2 weeks and will be taking the photo gear, but I'm not going to become a slave to it. I intend to to use a Kata rucsac to achieve a bit of comfort between shoots. Richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
300f2.8 / 500F4 Dilemma
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top