What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1499778" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>Yes, I am tempted Terry but reviews seem to vary and you are paying a big premium for the DO technology. Having said that I have seen some very nice shots on BF taken with this lens.</p><p>I do not think that a 300/2.8 + 2x or 400 DO + 1.4 will be a lot better than the 400/5.6 + 1.4 from an IQ point of view so for me it is just figuring out if IS and a stop of light is worth the big bucks.</p><p>I am a little concerned about carrying the 300/2.8 for long periods as it is double the weight of my current lens and still as heavy as the 400/5.6 plus tripod and gimbal head. Weight wise the 400 DO wins it of course.</p><p></p><p>Another option I have been looking at is getting a 1D3 which would give me AF at f8 on the centre point with my current set-up.</p><p></p><p>Then again the more you read the more you come back to the 500/4 8-P</p><p></p><p>I have had the cash burning a hole in my pocket for some time now but just cannot decide and it is driving me nuts :-O</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1499778, member: 18798"] Yes, I am tempted Terry but reviews seem to vary and you are paying a big premium for the DO technology. Having said that I have seen some very nice shots on BF taken with this lens. I do not think that a 300/2.8 + 2x or 400 DO + 1.4 will be a lot better than the 400/5.6 + 1.4 from an IQ point of view so for me it is just figuring out if IS and a stop of light is worth the big bucks. I am a little concerned about carrying the 300/2.8 for long periods as it is double the weight of my current lens and still as heavy as the 400/5.6 plus tripod and gimbal head. Weight wise the 400 DO wins it of course. Another option I have been looking at is getting a 1D3 which would give me AF at f8 on the centre point with my current set-up. Then again the more you read the more you come back to the 500/4 8-P I have had the cash burning a hole in my pocket for some time now but just cannot decide and it is driving me nuts :-O [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top