What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GlynH" data-source="post: 1503453" data-attributes="member: 74745"><p>I personally use Nikon and can only go by what mates who use canon tell me. </p><p>So is the 40d a better camera than the 50d? seems strange that canon would take a step backwards in their developments and charge more for it. Mates who have the 40d do a batch sharpening on their pics but mates who have the 50d dont. Is there a feature in the 40d that needs switching on to allow in camera sharpening, </p><p> im not playing devils advocate here or trying to start a mines better than yours discussion. Just trying to point out the 50d may be better than the 40d if compared against a d300, in terms of price and features.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GlynH, post: 1503453, member: 74745"] I personally use Nikon and can only go by what mates who use canon tell me. So is the 40d a better camera than the 50d? seems strange that canon would take a step backwards in their developments and charge more for it. Mates who have the 40d do a batch sharpening on their pics but mates who have the 50d dont. Is there a feature in the 40d that needs switching on to allow in camera sharpening, im not playing devils advocate here or trying to start a mines better than yours discussion. Just trying to point out the 50d may be better than the 40d if compared against a d300, in terms of price and features. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top