What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GlynH" data-source="post: 1503481" data-attributes="member: 74745"><p>If i was Gaz and already had a d200 then i would go Nikon again. He must have some accessories that would need changing if he went with the Canon option, so the price differential would be less when he came to include changing these also,if price is the only consideration. </p><p>Though if he went for the 50D then the price difference is only £300 between the Nikon and the Canon setup not a lot when you consider the outlay needed to buy either options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GlynH, post: 1503481, member: 74745"] If i was Gaz and already had a d200 then i would go Nikon again. He must have some accessories that would need changing if he went with the Canon option, so the price differential would be less when he came to include changing these also,if price is the only consideration. Though if he went for the 50D then the price difference is only £300 between the Nikon and the Canon setup not a lot when you consider the outlay needed to buy either options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top