What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whopper" data-source="post: 1503728" data-attributes="member: 77218"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>I'm currently going through the same nightmare of selecting the next lens. </p><p>I'm looking for a lens that is good for BIF and wildlife. During my internet research, it became clear that i'm not alone in trying to find the best option out there. The lens options that i'm considering are the Canon 500/f4, 300/f2.8 and 400/f5.6. So, today i went to my local dealer and had a chat with him. The end result is that i most likely go for the 300/f2.8 with converters. </p><p></p><p>Why?. Well, the 500 is very nice but it is heavy for walking around and it has a minimum focus distance of 4.5m. The 400/f5.6 is sharp and fast focussing, but already a f/5.6 lens and a minimum focus distance of 3.5m. This leaves the 300/f2.8 which i can use bare or with a 1.4x for BIF and for wildlife with a 2x. </p><p></p><p>But i'm not buying yet, because i'm waiting for what Canon has to offer in August/September when they normally announce new things. This could be good or bad news for me.</p><p></p><p>Hope i could help.</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p></p><p>Rob</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whopper, post: 1503728, member: 77218"] Hi, I'm currently going through the same nightmare of selecting the next lens. I'm looking for a lens that is good for BIF and wildlife. During my internet research, it became clear that i'm not alone in trying to find the best option out there. The lens options that i'm considering are the Canon 500/f4, 300/f2.8 and 400/f5.6. So, today i went to my local dealer and had a chat with him. The end result is that i most likely go for the 300/f2.8 with converters. Why?. Well, the 500 is very nice but it is heavy for walking around and it has a minimum focus distance of 4.5m. The 400/f5.6 is sharp and fast focussing, but already a f/5.6 lens and a minimum focus distance of 3.5m. This leaves the 300/f2.8 which i can use bare or with a 1.4x for BIF and for wildlife with a 2x. But i'm not buying yet, because i'm waiting for what Canon has to offer in August/September when they normally announce new things. This could be good or bad news for me. Hope i could help. Regards, Rob [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
300mm f2.8....A decent walkabout lens?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top