• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

4 micros (1 Viewer)

martin kitching

Obsessed seawatcher
Continuing the run of trapping sessions with plenty of micros, last night's haul included these 4. I think that the first one is Celypha lacunana, the second one Plutella xylostella(although it doesn't seem to be exactly the same as others that I've caught), the third one I've never seen before and the fourth one I'm sure is a tort although I'm still struggling after referring to Bradley, Tremewan and Smith (I find it difficult, although increasingly less so, to relate the moths in front of me to the position of the specimens in the book).

cheers
martin
 

Attachments

  • Micro4b0706070001.JPG
    Micro4b0706070001.JPG
    134.9 KB · Views: 57
  • Micro3a0706070001.JPG
    Micro3a0706070001.JPG
    104.2 KB · Views: 70
  • Micro1a0706070001.JPG
    Micro1a0706070001.JPG
    110.5 KB · Views: 68
  • Micro2a0706070001.JPG
    Micro2a0706070001.JPG
    129.8 KB · Views: 65
Always impressed you can separate these tricky Epiblemas Mike. What pointed you to trimaculana in this one?

I agree #3 doesn't look like a moth. Could be Eupterix aurata or something similar.
 
Always impressed you can separate these tricky Epiblemas Mike. What pointed you to trimaculana in this one?

I agree #3 doesn't look like a moth. Could be Eupterix aurata or something similar.

#3 certainly isn't a moth!

OK, you got me bang to rights with trimaculana - it was technically a punt! I've dissected a few that have that mucky grey coloration around the black mid-dorsal spot and termen and they've all proved to be trimac. E.roborana and E.rosaecolana somehow look a bit 'cleaner'. But...it should technically go down as an agg. I suppose.

Mike
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top