What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Panasonic
4k Video and Computer Requirements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scotview" data-source="post: 3342427" data-attributes="member: 91622"><p><strong>4K versus 1080</strong></p><p></p><p>Hi SanAngelo,</p><p></p><p>The following is a general observation :</p><p></p><p>I have recently upgraded to a Lenovo laptop with a 15" 4K screen. Even on this relatively small 15" screen, the difference between viewing 4K and 1080 video or jpeg images is significant, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>I have recently purchased a 36" Seiki 4K tv (£200) to use as a monitor and this shows up the difference between 4K (UHD) and 1080 (HD) to an even greater degree. YOU DO NEED A PC/LAPTOP CAPABLE OF OUTPUTING a 4K HDMI SIGNAL.</p><p></p><p>I feel that photographers (up to now) have really concentrated on the hardware for CAPTURING the images ie cameras and lenses. To me the OUTPUT or viewing end is just as, if not more, important.</p><p></p><p>To view your results you can either produce colour prints (A4, A3 etc) OR you can view your pictures on a screen. The added pleasure of viewing my photos/video at 4K resolution has justified my investment in 4K. To view high quality images produced on a high quality camera/lens on a 1080 or worse 720 display seems a bit futile considering the advances in today's screen technology. A mid range camera jpeg image on a 4k display will give a superior viewing experince to a high end camera jpeg image on a 720 or 1080 display.I should think that 99% of image viewing is on screen rather than expensive, large prints. However....a high quality image from a top flight camera/lens, viewed on an ultra high definition display will undoubtedly give the best results overall......quality prevails !!</p><p></p><p>To your specific point on grabbing 4K images:</p><p></p><p>You can grab jpeg images using VLC player. Image grabs are not dependent on the screen resolution of the PC but on the resolution of the video file. For example if I grab an image from AVCHD footage taken on my Panasonic FZ72 the resulting jpeg will be 1920 by 1080 pixels. If I grab a jpeg from footage taken on my Panasonic G7, the jpeg resolution will be 3840X2160. Furthermore these images can be grabbed from a non 4K PC, provided it can play the footage.</p><p>HOWEVER, viewing the 1080 or 2160 image on a 1080 monitor will only display at 1080, whereas a 4K monitor will display the 1080 jpeg at 1080 or an "upscaled" jpeg and display the 2160 jpeg in true 4k (UHD) ultra high definition format (4 times the detail !!), a totally different viewing experience !</p><p></p><p>Sorry if you are already aware of this but I thought it was worthwhile describing the image grabbing process and viewing experience in simple terms. </p><p></p><p>Hope this helps and adds to the debate.</p><p></p><p>Scotview</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scotview, post: 3342427, member: 91622"] [b]4K versus 1080[/b] Hi SanAngelo, The following is a general observation : I have recently upgraded to a Lenovo laptop with a 15" 4K screen. Even on this relatively small 15" screen, the difference between viewing 4K and 1080 video or jpeg images is significant, in my opinion. I have recently purchased a 36" Seiki 4K tv (£200) to use as a monitor and this shows up the difference between 4K (UHD) and 1080 (HD) to an even greater degree. YOU DO NEED A PC/LAPTOP CAPABLE OF OUTPUTING a 4K HDMI SIGNAL. I feel that photographers (up to now) have really concentrated on the hardware for CAPTURING the images ie cameras and lenses. To me the OUTPUT or viewing end is just as, if not more, important. To view your results you can either produce colour prints (A4, A3 etc) OR you can view your pictures on a screen. The added pleasure of viewing my photos/video at 4K resolution has justified my investment in 4K. To view high quality images produced on a high quality camera/lens on a 1080 or worse 720 display seems a bit futile considering the advances in today's screen technology. A mid range camera jpeg image on a 4k display will give a superior viewing experince to a high end camera jpeg image on a 720 or 1080 display.I should think that 99% of image viewing is on screen rather than expensive, large prints. However....a high quality image from a top flight camera/lens, viewed on an ultra high definition display will undoubtedly give the best results overall......quality prevails !! To your specific point on grabbing 4K images: You can grab jpeg images using VLC player. Image grabs are not dependent on the screen resolution of the PC but on the resolution of the video file. For example if I grab an image from AVCHD footage taken on my Panasonic FZ72 the resulting jpeg will be 1920 by 1080 pixels. If I grab a jpeg from footage taken on my Panasonic G7, the jpeg resolution will be 3840X2160. Furthermore these images can be grabbed from a non 4K PC, provided it can play the footage. HOWEVER, viewing the 1080 or 2160 image on a 1080 monitor will only display at 1080, whereas a 4K monitor will display the 1080 jpeg at 1080 or an "upscaled" jpeg and display the 2160 jpeg in true 4k (UHD) ultra high definition format (4 times the detail !!), a totally different viewing experience ! Sorry if you are already aware of this but I thought it was worthwhile describing the image grabbing process and viewing experience in simple terms. Hope this helps and adds to the debate. Scotview [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Panasonic
4k Video and Computer Requirements
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top