What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
50D or 40D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CAU" data-source="post: 1332193" data-attributes="member: 55324"><p>I'm not familiar with the technology of the D3, but wouldn't this just be the same thing as cropping the central 10-12 MP of the original 21 MP, i.e. not a too special upgrade at all (as the same can be done in PP to images from all cameras)? Of course the smaller DX mode pictures would take less storage space and enable slightly faster shooting (as the camera doesn't need to process as many pixels), but the quality of the image would remain the same. DPReview says this:</p><p>"...whether used in DX crop mode or full frame (for cropping later)..." </p><p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD3/page34.asp" target="_blank">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD3/page34.asp</a></p><p></p><p>Shooting with a FF sensor and a DX format lens could be compared to digiscoping with a setup that produces vignetting. In this case the camera (the D3) just automatically crops the image so that the vignetting disappears, but you end up with an image that has fewer pixels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CAU, post: 1332193, member: 55324"] I'm not familiar with the technology of the D3, but wouldn't this just be the same thing as cropping the central 10-12 MP of the original 21 MP, i.e. not a too special upgrade at all (as the same can be done in PP to images from all cameras)? Of course the smaller DX mode pictures would take less storage space and enable slightly faster shooting (as the camera doesn't need to process as many pixels), but the quality of the image would remain the same. DPReview says this: "...whether used in DX crop mode or full frame (for cropping later)..." [url]http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD3/page34.asp[/url] Shooting with a FF sensor and a DX format lens could be compared to digiscoping with a setup that produces vignetting. In this case the camera (the D3) just automatically crops the image so that the vignetting disappears, but you end up with an image that has fewer pixels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
50D or 40D?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top