What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
50D or 40D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helios" data-source="post: 1333589" data-attributes="member: 46553"><p>Christine,</p><p></p><p>Sorry, it wasn't my intension to criticise the camera. I just thought that the extra megapixels is a real benefit for close-ups, ie allowing a higher ISO.</p><p></p><p>Jaff,</p><p></p><p>Usually try to keep the ISO at 400, but with a combination of some good rarities around, and the terrible weather, I was going up to ISO1600 and still had slow shutterspeeds. E.g. the Kent Red-flanked Bluetail which liked to keep to the shade (ISO1600 and a large application of noiseninja).</p><p></p><p>REcently had some close-ups to Marsh and Great tits at Warburg. Used ISO1600 with shutter speeds of 1/60 to 1/200 sec but still had some motion blur. I now think that I was too concervative and would have had better shots if I had increased the iso to 1600 (wouldn't try ISO6400 on the D300). Tried the flash but it didn't work. I only have the in-built camera flash which doesn't have enough reach. Also it scares the birds, and I only get one shot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helios, post: 1333589, member: 46553"] Christine, Sorry, it wasn't my intension to criticise the camera. I just thought that the extra megapixels is a real benefit for close-ups, ie allowing a higher ISO. Jaff, Usually try to keep the ISO at 400, but with a combination of some good rarities around, and the terrible weather, I was going up to ISO1600 and still had slow shutterspeeds. E.g. the Kent Red-flanked Bluetail which liked to keep to the shade (ISO1600 and a large application of noiseninja). REcently had some close-ups to Marsh and Great tits at Warburg. Used ISO1600 with shutter speeds of 1/60 to 1/200 sec but still had some motion blur. I now think that I was too concervative and would have had better shots if I had increased the iso to 1600 (wouldn't try ISO6400 on the D300). Tried the flash but it didn't work. I only have the in-built camera flash which doesn't have enough reach. Also it scares the birds, and I only get one shot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
50D or 40D?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top